海角大神

Less than a week after Prime Minister Shinzo Abe became the first Japanese leader to address a joint session of Congress, 187 of the world鈥檚 most prominent Asia scholars sent him a letter urging Japan to stop whitewashing its World War II history, including its policy of sexual slavery or 鈥渃omfort women."

Scholars from 10 nations told Mr. Abe that current nationalist-led efforts to revise Japan's accounting of its colonial and wartime behavior are blocking East Asia's ability to properly celebrate the 70th聽anniversary of peace and prosperity following the war. They urged Mr. Abe to 鈥渁ct boldly鈥� and take an accurate and just position on the past.

The list of signatories reads like a 鈥淲ho鈥檚 Who鈥� of Asian scholars, including Ezra Vogel and Akira Iriye of Harvard University, Ronald Dore of the London School of Economics, John Dower of MIT, and Herbert Bix of Binghamton University. The letter reached Abe on Monday.

鈥淭his year presents an opportunity for the government of Japan to show leadership by addressing Japan鈥檚 history of colonial rule and wartime aggression in both words and action,鈥� the academics wrote.

While Japan has apologized for World War II, albeit obliquely in the view of its neighbors, Abe's administration has sought actively to revise that history聽in recent years. Analysts attribute this to an effort by Abe to give his nation a prouder and more confident posture in Asia at a time when China is rising.

In its coverage of the letter, The Japan Times on Thursday pointed out that, "Conservative and right-wing politicians, academics and media in Japan, as well as Abe, have long insisted the Japanese government and military was not directly involved in recruiting the women and did not force them to serve in comfort women stations."

Earlier this year Japan took the unusual step of requesting the US textbook company McGraw-Hill to change its account of Japan鈥檚 wartime practice of rounding up women in occupied nations and providing them as sex partners for its soldiers. Abe himself has been part of an effort to suggest the women behaved in a voluntary manner in nations like Korea, and that local Koreans organized the military brothels, not Japan.

The 187 historians took exception with that revision:

鈥淭he 鈥榗omfort women鈥� system was distinguished by its large scale and systematic management under the military, and by its exploitation of young, poor, and vulnerable women in areas colonized or occupied by Japan,鈥� their letter said.

Bloomberg notes that Abe鈥檚 speech to the US Congress was seen with less ardor among Japan鈥檚 neighbors including South Korea and China:

Appealing to Abe鈥檚 speech April 29 on Capitol Hill about the universality of human rights, the historians asked that he apply that concept to the victims of the war.

鈥淲e applaud these sentiments and urge the Prime Minister to act boldly on all of them,鈥� the scholars wrote.

The comfort women issue has resonated most loudly in South Korea, America鈥檚 other major East Asian ally. The new Japanese position on comfort women has so offended Seoul that President Park Geun-hye has refused all bilateral meetings with Abe until the Japanese leader adopts a 鈥渃orrect view of history,鈥� as 海角大神 noted last week.

The Monitor quoted former South Korean foreign minister Han Sung-joo:聽

The historians' letter to Abe said China and Korea as well as Japan faced problems with nationalist extremism:

Among the 187, 11 were from Harvard. While the bulk of signatories came from the US, six were from Canada, five each from Germany and the UK, four from Australia, three from Japan, two from Austria, and one each from the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Singapore, according to South Korea's Hankyoreh. Their letter bolsters longstanding work done by Japanese scholars urging an honest accounting of Japan's war-related history.