海角大神

海角大神 / Text

The politics of meat and Muslims in election-year France

Conservative Marine Le Pen recently alleged that President Sarkozy had bowed to 'Islamic radicals.' It may be election-year gold, but restricting or demonizing Islamic practices could push disaffected youth toward those with radical agendas, says author Jonathan Laurence. 

By Scott Baldauf , Staff Writer

You know it鈥檚 an election year in France when the far-right presidential candidate starts talking about meat and Muslims.

Marie Le Pen, leader of the National Front, recently alleged that French President Nicholas Sarkozy had bowed to 鈥淚slamic radicals,鈥 in particular about how Muslims butcher animals for consumption. Ms. Le Pen 鈥 who has often called for stricter immigration laws and warned about 鈥渃reeping sharia (Islamic law)鈥 in the past 鈥 argues that the influence of Muslim minorities was so strong that today all the meat available for purchase in Paris is 鈥渉alal.鈥 According to cultural practices, Muslims only eat the meat of animals that have had their throats cut, allowing the blood to drain away.

Whether Ms. Le Pen is right on the halal issue or not 鈥 President Sarkozy says she鈥檚 wrong聽and that聽only 2.5 percent of the meat in Paris is either halal or kosher 鈥 her strong attacks against Sarkozy for being soft on France鈥檚 Muslim community are an indication of how concerned Le Pen thinks French people are about immigration. 聽And they are a window into a larger trend of unease in a recessionary Europe about how to deal with large Muslim minorities who initially came for temporary work, but ultimately stayed on, bringing their families and cultural practices with them.

A half-century ago, many European countries encouraged the immigration of laborers from the Middle East and South Asia. The loss of so many working-age men during World War II meant that Europeans had to turn elsewhere for the laborers to help man their factories and rebuild their economies. The assumption had always been that these laborers would return home; but like American soldiers after World War I, many Muslim laborers didn鈥檛 want to go back to the farm back home after they saw Paris.

Jonathan Laurence, a political scientist at Boston College and author of the book 鈥淭he Emancipation of Europe鈥檚 Muslims,鈥 says that France is not alone in its concerns over its growing Muslim minorities.

鈥淭he big picture is that in the last 20 years how much things have changed, and how governments have realized that people are here to stay,鈥 says Professor Laurence, in a recent conversation with Monitor editors. But now, as the European economy is shrinking or staying flat, European politicians have 鈥渞ealized there is election gold in undoing the little they got done鈥 in changing their laws to accommodate Muslim minorities.

You can see it in France's 2011 ban on Muslim head scarves聽for women, in Switzerland鈥檚 2009 ban on the construction of minarets聽at mosques, and in the bans of a northern Spanish region against the public calls to prayer at local mosques. All of these moves reflect growing concern among some Europeans that their culture is being eroded by recent immigration of people with different cultural practices and religious beliefs, says Laurence.

Such practices may be legally justifiable, Human Rights Watch says, but in practice they are discriminatory toward religious minorities.

Banning certain aspects of Islamic practice may be popular with voters within the majority community 鈥 and indeed, there is a similar anti-Islamic mood present in the US as well, with the controversy over an聽Islamic cultural center in New York City聽near the World Trade Center and with Oklahoma鈥檚 attempt to聽restrict the consideration of sharia law in US courts.

But rejection of another鈥檚 culture is counterproductive, says Laurence. If Europeans are worried about the influx of Islamic culture, the worst thing they can do is alienate Muslim migrants from the larger society. In certain cases, this could push disaffected young Muslims into the waiting arms of that small minority of preachers with radical agendas. A better method, Laurence says, would be to accept that Muslims are in Europe to stay, and then grant Islamic communities the same official status 鈥 and regulatory practices 鈥 that 海角大神 and Jewish congregations currently enjoy.

鈥淎llow Muslim prayer spaces to register officially, and you won鈥檛 have street prayers,鈥 he says, referring to聽the practice of holding Friday afternoon prayers in public spaces such as sidewalks or public parks for lack of available prayer spaces. 鈥淗elp provide theological training for local imams, and you won鈥檛 have to rely on foreign imams with radical agendas.鈥

Such accommodation may be difficult to muster in these times of political and economic uncertainty, so Laurence says the next best option would be 鈥渂enign neglect.鈥

鈥淲e need benign neglect. If you keep polarizing positions, then the radicals of both sides will dig in their heels,鈥 he says. 鈥淏ut if you want to resolve these issues, then you have to accommodate the minority community.鈥