Once 鈥榚xtinct鈥 in Canada, the Sinixt people are reclaiming their ancestral home
When a country recognizes the rights of peoples to use their ancestral territory but they live in a different country, it raises tricky questions around access and sovereignty. That鈥檚 just what鈥檚 happening in Canada with the Sinixt Confederacy.
When a country recognizes the rights of peoples to use their ancestral territory but they live in a different country, it raises tricky questions around access and sovereignty. That鈥檚 just what鈥檚 happening in Canada with the Sinixt Confederacy.
Shelly Boyd descends into the depression on the banks of the Kootenay River in British Columbia.
She鈥檚 Native American, but her Sinixt ancestors once sheltered in these pit houses, or traditional Indigenous dwellings, to wait out long winters. Being here today, she says, she feels 鈥渟acredness鈥 all around her.
She鈥檚 always been able to visit these lands in Canada, across the border from where she was born in U.S. territory. But now, after a groundbreaking Canadian Supreme Court decision, she鈥檚 more than just a tourist.
Members of the Lakes Tribe of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation in Washington state are now one of the 鈥淎boriginal peoples of Canada鈥 under the country鈥檚 constitution, with protected rights聽鈥 regardless of the fact that they aren鈥檛 Canadian citizens or residents.
In many ways, their work has just begun.
It has been over three years since the case was decided, and one year since the Sinixt Confederacy, as the Sinixt people have named their branch in Canada, established a physical office in Nelson, British Columbia. Now they are on a fact-sharing and education mission with federal, provincial, and local officials in this western province to teach their ethnographic history聽鈥 and find ways to formally establish themselves.
The provincial and federal governments have been slow to recognize the Sinixt聽鈥 鈥済lacial鈥 is how their lawyer puts it. How they eventually find their place and recognition in Canada could have enormous implications for other Indigenous people across North America whose communities were disjoined by the United States-Canada border. Some of those communities are already testing the new rights conferred by the ruling.
鈥淏orders don鈥檛 define us,鈥 says Jarred-Michael Erickson, chair of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation on the sidelines of a conference the Sinixt Confederacy held in Nelson with local stakeholders. 鈥淭he border is an imaginary line that the Canadian and U.S. governments made up, and all of a sudden we were stuck on one side of it.鈥
Until now.
Reunited with their ancestors鈥 land
This fight started with an elk hunt.
Many Sinixt, whose traditional territory extends from Kinbasket Lake north of Revelstoke in British Columbia southward to Kettle Falls in Washington, today reside on the U.S. side of the border on the Colville Reservation. The Canadian government declared them 鈥渆xtinct鈥 in 1956.
More than 50 years later, Rick Desautel, a member of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and a U.S. citizen, shot a cow elk for ceremonial meat in British Columbia in a strategic effort to get arrested. It was 2010, and he was charged for not having a license and for hunting big game without being a provincial resident. In his defense, he argued he was exercising his Aboriginal right to hunt in ancestral territory.
His case drew support from over a dozen cross-border groups and other Indigenous organizations. Mr. Desautel won three successive victories in the lower courts, and in 2021, a majority of Canada鈥檚 Supreme Court agreed with him, too. The court effectively ruled that Indigenous people who are descendants of those who lived in what is now Canada prior to European contact, but without modern Canadian citizenship or residency, can be considered 鈥淎boriginal peoples of Canada.鈥 To deny that right, the court ruled, would 鈥渞isk perpetuating the historical injustice suffered by Aboriginal peoples at the hands of Europeans.鈥
It also reverses the ruling on the Sinixt鈥檚 extinction. 鈥淚f we鈥檇 lost, it would have just wiped us out of this country,鈥 says Mr. Desautel in an interview in Nelson. Specifically, the case affirmed that the Sinixt have Canadian constitutional rights to fish, hunt, and gather on their ancestral lands.
But, he adds, 鈥渨e鈥檝e opened a can of worms.鈥
Among the questions now being posed: What other rights are they entitled to as one of the 鈥淎boriginal peoples of Canada鈥? How should they be consulted on development or resource projects that go through their ancestors鈥 territory? Do they have the right to cross the border and live and work freely?
Among the biggest questions right now, says Mark Underhill, the lawyer who represented the Sinixt at the Supreme Court, is how many other transborder groups in the U.S. will try to establish rights in Canada. Already, seven tribes in Alaska have sought a say in a mining project in northern British Columbia, citing the Desautel case.
That鈥檚 why the case was so contentious to begin with. Six provinces and territories that border the U.S. intervened against the Sinixt. Attorneys argued that granting rights to non-Canadian citizens outside Canada would be incompatible with Canadian sovereignty.
鈥淚f Indigenous Mexicans tried to interfere with California鈥檚 internal affairs, there would be outcry [in the U.S.] against foreigners trying to interfere,鈥 says Peter Best, a retired lawyer in the mining community of Sudbury, Ontario, who has written against this case.
A mixed reception up north?
The new Sinixt office in Nelson primarily deals with fish and wildlife services. And for the most part, the Sinixt say they feel welcome in this liberal town that has traditionally drawn artists and Americans escaping the draft during the Vietnam War.
鈥淲e have been working very diligently in 鈥楾ruth and Reconciliation,鈥欌 says Mayor Janice Morrison, referring to the Canadian government鈥檚 framework, under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, for justice for Indigenous peoples across Canada. She sees this fight as part of their town鈥檚 Reconciliation work.
But much confusion remains. James Baxter, a biologist who is non-Indigenous and runs the Sinixt Nelson office, says that the Sinixt should be consulted on development work under the constitution, but aren鈥檛 in the consultative databases as they should be. 鈥淚f someone wants to build a gravel pit in Nelson [right now], the Sinixt Confederacy isn鈥檛 going to come up as one of the groups they have to engage with.鈥
Cindy Marchand, who sits on the Colville Business Council and was the second tribe member to hunt on Canadian soil, says the fight to establish themselves has been slow. 鈥淲e are still fighting tooth and nail just to be recognized up here,鈥 she says.
They鈥檝e come against some opponents, including other Indigenous groups in the area skeptical of their rights claims. The Sinixt, or other transnational peoples, could face opposition over future development and resource extraction, too.
鈥淚t鈥檚 almost like with any relationship you have 鈥 in order to develop and grow it, you have to have conversations. And that鈥檚 where we鈥檙e at right now,鈥 Ms. Marchand says. 鈥淪ometimes we鈥檙e welcome, and sometimes we鈥檙e not. And unfortunately we鈥檙e not welcomed even by other First Nations.鈥
Ms. Boyd says that despite all the pejorative terms that Indigenous people have been called in the past, a new one has emerged after the Supreme Court ruling: 鈥淎merican Indian.鈥
She remains undeterred. This is not about power or money, she says. 鈥淲e want to be consulted on what happens with land issues, and that we will have input and a hand in what happens here,鈥 she explains. 鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 mean that you鈥檙e owning [the land]. It means you鈥檙e taking care of it.鈥
Ms. Boyd says, 鈥淎ll we ever really wanted was to come home.鈥