Does new George Bush book throw his son under the bus? Hardly
George H.W. Bush has some hard words for his son's advisers 鈥� and for George W. himself 鈥� in a new biography. But ultimately, the Bush family is closing ranks.聽
George H.W. Bush has some hard words for his son's advisers 鈥� and for George W. himself 鈥� in a new biography. But ultimately, the Bush family is closing ranks.聽
Dick Cheney became a different person after the 9/11 attacks 鈥� 鈥渧ery hard line.鈥� As vice president during the George W. Bush administration. Mr. Cheney seemed eager to use military force to solve all United States security problems in the Middle East.
Meanwhile, Bush鈥檚 secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, was a self-serving 鈥渋ron ass鈥� who 鈥渟erved the president very badly.鈥�
Who鈥檚 the harsh critic making those assessments? It鈥檚 none other than Bush family patriarch George Herbert Walker Bush, himself the 41st president of the United States.
They鈥檙e excerpts appearing in The New York Times from a new biography, 鈥淒estiny and Power: The American Odyssey of George Herbert Walker Bush鈥� that鈥檚 got Washington buzzing over its portrayal of Bush 41's attitude towards his son George W.鈥檚 presidency, among other juicy items.
The elder Bush gave extensive interviews and provided family diaries to author Jon Meacham. His criticisms are mostly on-the-record quotes, not secondhand leaks attributed to some 鈥渇amily friend with knowledge of Bush 41鈥檚 thinking.鈥�
In general, Bush 41 in the book defends his son鈥檚 presidency, including the decision to invade Iraq in 2003. He says that the exercise of US power and the toppling of Saddam Hussein were a 鈥減roud moment.鈥�
鈥淪addam鈥檚 gone, and with him went a lot of brutality and nastiness and awfulness,鈥� Bush told Meacham.
That鈥檚 notable, because as the man who ran the Gulf War, George Herbert Walker Bush years earlier pulled back from Baghdad. He expelled Iraq from Kuwait but left Hussein in place. At the time he felt the international coalition he鈥檇 pulled together to prosecute the war would not support toppling the Iraqi regime.
Bush does chide his son for overly hot rhetoric, mentioning the latter鈥檚 鈥淎xis of Evil鈥� speech as an example. But with his direct words about Cheney and Rumsfeld, which include an assessment that Cheney had built a separate foreign policy brain trust from that of the president, the Bush family leader seems to be defending his son鈥檚 overall leadership.
Will this change how the US views the Iraq War, and/or the Bush 43 presidency? That鈥檚 debatable but we鈥檇 say it鈥檚 unlikely it will. History usually holds presidents responsible for their top aides. After all it鈥檚 the presidents who put those aides in their jobs in the first place.
Nor is Bush 41鈥檚 displeasure with the aggression of the Iraq War team a secret. By the end of his second term even his son appeared to have cut them out of his innermost circle. Rumsfeld was gone, replaced as Defense Secretary by Robert Gates in 2006. Cheney鈥檚 influence had waned, though he was able to convince Bush to grant clemency to aide Lewis 鈥淪cooter鈥� Libby, who had been convicted of obstruction of justice in the leak of the name of CIA agent Valerie Plame.
If nothing else the elder Bush is doing his best to polish his family鈥檚 record for historians to come 鈥� at a time when the presidential bid of George W.鈥檚 brother Jeb is sputtering.
Dad鈥檚 remarks 鈥渙ffer a way for the famously tight-knit Bush clan to once more close ranks around one of their own,"聽writes The Atlantic鈥檚 David Graham.