海角大神

Is racial animosity behind some political criticism of the Obama administration? That鈥檚 what Attorney General Eric Holder said on Sunday. The exact phrase he used was 鈥渞acial animus,鈥� which he said motivates some of his and Obama鈥檚 political opponents.

鈥淭here鈥檚 a certain level of vehemence, it seems to me, that鈥檚 directed at me, directed at the president,鈥� Attorney General Holder told ABC. 鈥淵ou know, people talking about taking their country back.... There鈥檚 a certain racial component to this for some people. I don鈥檛 think this is the thing that is a main driver, but for some there鈥檚 a racial animus.鈥�

Much of the opposition to President Obama鈥檚 policies is ideological, Holder added. He said that 50 years after Freedom Summer, when civil rights activists moved into the South to try and register African-Americans to vote, the US has made 鈥渓ots of progress鈥� on issues of race. But there is still some distance to travel on the issue, said the attorney general.

鈥淚鈥檓 very optimistic this country will get there ... [but] I think we are still a nation that is too afraid to confront racial issues,鈥� said Holder.

This has not gone down well with some on the right. At the National Review Hans A. von Spakovsky writes that Holder鈥檚 latest claim shows that the attorney general is 鈥渄isconnected from reality.鈥�

Holder has selectively enforced civil rights laws on a racial basis, as when he dropped a case the Justice Department had already won against the New Black Panther Party for intimidating voters in front of a Philadelphia polling place in 2008, according to von Spakovsky.

鈥淗older views the world through a racial prism that distorts his judgment,鈥� he writes.

At the right-leaning "Hot Air!" Noah Rothman used even tougher language. The Obama administration long ago perfected the art of cultivating the sense among its defenders that lingering racism inspires most of its critics, according to Mr. Rothman. If the US was still so racially sensitive, why did it reelect an African-American president?

Conservatives who say they want to 鈥渢ake their country back鈥� aren鈥檛 using coded racial phrases 鈥� they think Obama has overstepped is constitutional authority, Rothman writes.

鈥淣o one is listening to this nonsense beyond the cult of true believers. Those for who racism is a religion 鈥� ubiquitous and unfalsifiable 鈥� nod in agreement at Holder鈥檚 self-aggrandizement. All others roll their eyes,鈥� writes Rothman.

Hmm, that鈥檚 a pretty angry reaction, isn鈥檛 it? There鈥檚 a reason for that, according to Emory University School of Law professor Dorothy Brown. It鈥檚 unusual for whites to hear what black men think about race. They鈥檙e surprised when they do.

Furthermore, Holder鈥檚 words were fairly mild, writes Professor Brown at CNN. He said 鈥渟ome鈥� of the opposition to Obama is caused by race, but it鈥檚 not a main driver. But critics are reacting as if Holder said that racism is the main obstacle facing Obama鈥檚 efforts.

鈥淚t is as if when certain whites hear the word race (or a derivative) as the explanation for any part of an event, they go situationally deaf,鈥� writes Brown.

Whites and blacks have different views about many things, she continues. Asked in a recent Gallup poll whether the US justice system is biased against blacks, 69 percent of whites said 鈥渘o.鈥� Sixty-eight percent of blacks said 鈥測es.鈥�

By and large, when talking about race in the US, whites talk to other whites, and blacks talk to other blacks, writes Brown. This one of the lessons from the uproar over Holder鈥檚 words is that the races should talk more to each other.

鈥淎s I tell my students when I teach about race and the law, I note that important breakthroughs on race can only come when you have a conversation with someone who doesn鈥檛 look like you and doesn鈥檛 think like you,鈥� she writes.