海角大神

Will 鈥� can 鈥� Donald Trump talk to all Americans with his inaugural address on Friday?

Normally that鈥檚 not a difficult question to answer about a new president鈥檚 first speech. Most talk about their vision for the nation and how they鈥檒l strive to represent US citizens as a whole. The best have moments of soaring optimism. Think John F. Kennedy鈥檚 inaugural 鈥� 鈥淎sk not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country,鈥� etc.

But President-elect Trump鈥檚 biggest set-piece speech to date was dark and self-focused. This was his nomination acceptance address at the Republican National Convention, where he ticked off a list of perceived problems and offered himself as the solution. 鈥淚 alone can fix it,鈥� he said of the US political system.

Perhaps on Jan. 20 the newly sworn-in Trump will switch from the individual to the collective.

'We' is inclusive

Instead of 鈥淚鈥� he should stress 鈥渨e,鈥� according to leadership coach John Baldoni, who鈥檚 written on the inaugural question for Forbes.

鈥淚鈥� is a pronoun that leans toward authoritarianism, says Mr. Baldoni. That might be OK for an executive job interview. But a top executive 鈥� and especially a US president 鈥� needs the help and support of a vast number of people to get anything done.

鈥淎 president has to bear in mind that he or she is a representative of the entire nation,鈥� says Baldoni. 鈥淲e have a shared destiny. When you use 鈥榳e,鈥� you are inclusive.鈥�

According to his aides, this is a message Trump has heard. His inaugural address is not going to be full of taunts for his adversaries or a to-do list for Congress.

Instead, it will be a personal statement about the country鈥檚 future, said incoming White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Thursday. He鈥檒l talk about the meaning of being an American and the challenges facing the middle class.

鈥淚t鈥檚 going to be less of an agenda and more of a philosophical document, a vision of where he sees the country,鈥� said Spicer at a press conference.

Nor will it drone on. Historian Douglas Brinkley, who met with Trump earlier this week to talk about past inaugurals, said that the new president does not want to keep people out in the cold.

鈥淗e doesn鈥檛 want it to be long,鈥� said Mr. Brinkley, emerging from his Trump Tower get-together.

For Trump the good news is that his competition isn鈥檛 too stiff. There have been 57 inaugural addresses in the nation鈥檚 history, and most were dreadful. Until the late 19th century they tended to wander into impenetrable thickets of classical history. (William Henry Harrison: 鈥淭he boasted privilege of a Roman citizen was to him a shield only against a petty provincial ruler, whilst the proud Democrat of Athens鈥︹��)

They were long. They digressed. They chewed over issues and bits of legislative gristle utterly unremembered today. Some had a sort of boring peevishness about them. (Ulysses S. Grant: 鈥淚 have been the subject of abuse and slander scarcely ever equaled in political history, which today I feel that I can afford to disregard.鈥�)

Some contained predictions as wrong as they could be. In 1857, with the US roiled in sectional turmoil, James Buchanan said of slavery, 鈥淢ay we not then, hope that the long agitation on this subject is approaching its end.鈥�

The Civil War began four years later.

But the good ones were something.

Only four exceptional addresses

Really, there have only been four exceptional US presidential inaugural addresses. All were a matter of great writing meeting a time of crisis.

Two were by Abraham Lincoln, about whom little more can be said. One was Franklin Delano Roosevelt鈥檚 first inaugural speech, in 1932, when he told a nation shaking from the Depression 鈥渢he only thing we have to fear is fear itself.鈥�

The fourth was JFK鈥檚. Lincoln鈥檚 and FDR鈥檚 addresses wandered at times. But Kennedy 鈥� whatever you think of his actual policies 鈥� produced a straight-through masterpiece with aide Ted Sorensen.

Every word rang true, and glowed like burning coal. There was the 鈥渁sk not鈥� cadence. There was the 鈥渓et the word go forth 鈥� that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans鈥� part.

With the Cold War looming, there was this geopolitically relevant passage:

鈥淟et every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and success of liberty.

鈥淭his much we pledge 鈥� and more.鈥�

Gives you chills even today, doesn鈥檛 it?

Tremendous opportunity

Kennedy鈥檚 speech had both good lines and an elegant structure. That could be a lesson for Donald Trump. Snappy lines may make good tweets, or good cable TV discussion. But inaugural addresses are unique moments when many Americans, and people across the world, are listening to an entire speech, says Kathryn Cramer Brownell, an assistant professor of history at Purdue University and author of 鈥淪howbiz Politics: Hollywood in American Political Life.鈥�

鈥淪o if Trump caters simply to Twitter-friendly catch phrases (that may or may not resonate with viewers) he risks losing the tremendous opportunity the inauguration presents to align his critics with his vision for the country,鈥� writes Professor Brownell in an email response to a journalist鈥檚 question.

One last point: Remember the 鈥淚鈥� and 鈥渨e.鈥�

JFK used 鈥淚鈥� in four places, with three of those in rapid-fire succession near the end. 鈥淲e?鈥� It was in his inaugural address 34 times.