海角大神

As the deadly exchanges of rocket fire and airstrikes between Israel and Hamas in Gaza entered their second week Monday, the White House issued a statement in which for the first time President Joe Biden expressed his support for a 鈥渃ease-fire鈥� in the hostilities.

But as if to rule out any doubts about where Mr. Biden stands, the readout of the president鈥檚 second call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in three days also 鈥渞eiterated his firm support for Israel鈥檚 right to defend itself against indiscriminate attacks.鈥澛犅犅�

The use of the term 鈥渃ease-fire鈥� indicated a slight evolution in the president鈥檚 outlook on the conflict. But the absence of any pressure to actually end hostilities also suggested that Mr. Biden remains firmly planted in his unblinking and careerlong support for Israel.

Diplomats and regional experts call Mr. Biden鈥檚 approach 鈥済iving Israel space鈥� to bludgeon Hamas 鈥� which the U.S. considers a terrorist organization 鈥� and to degrade its offensive capabilities and forces before applying any pressure to end the fighting.

This American green light to Israel is not new, even though it may have shined brightest under an unabashedly one-sided President Donald Trump, analysts say. But it is just one element in聽a聽steady deterioration of the ability of the United States to play its traditional role of聽mediator聽in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

鈥淭he honest broker role has been eroding for a lot longer than we鈥檝e been willing to acknowledge,鈥� says Bruce Jentleson, who was a State Department senior adviser on Middle East issues during the Obama administration and is now a professor of public policy at Duke University in North Carolina.

Noting that the Palestinians didn鈥檛 trust President George W. Bush and the Israelis openly undermined President Barack Obama, he says 鈥淭rump blew up the 鈥榟onest broker鈥� role big time, but the truth is, it wasn鈥檛 in good shape before him鈥� 鈥� and really hasn鈥檛 been, he adds, since President Bill Clinton.

In his initial months in office, Mr. Biden has demonstrated a desire to shift attention and resources away from the Middle East 鈥� even as the U.S. comes to grips with the reality that it is no longer the unrivaled superpower in a region where it faces the growing influence of lesser powers like Russia and Iran.

Yet despite this evolution, the U.S. remains the sole power with any ability to play an influential leadership role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. What聽all this聽means, Professor Jentleson says, is that while the U.S. can 鈥渙rchestrate, convene and coordinate鈥� in a region with lots of players with often conflicting interests, 鈥渢he U.S. can no longer be calling the shots.鈥�

Moreover, it also means that once a cease-fire in the current fighting is reached, the Biden administration will very likely find it has to invest more political capital than it originally intended in a conflict that has dogged administrations for decades.

For some, the current 鈥渟pace鈥� that President Biden is extending to Israel harks back to the support Condoleezza Rice, as secretary of state under President Bush, initially offered Israel during the 2009 violence between Hamas and Israel.

鈥淭his is not the Biden template; this is actually the classic American template鈥� and a 鈥渞eturn to the established U.S. policy in these kinds of situations that preceded Trump,鈥� says Ghaith al-Omari, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former adviser to Palestinian negotiators at Clinton administration-era peace talks.

What does mediating mean?

Noting that 鈥渢here鈥檚 only so much space the U.S. can give鈥� before pressures mount 鈥� particularly over rising civilian casualties 鈥� he says 鈥渢he Jordanians, the Egyptians, Turkey, the Palestinians and others are watching to see: Is the U.S. capable 鈥� of taking leadership鈥� while demonstrating an understanding that 鈥渓eadership doesn鈥檛 necessarily mean monopoly, it means the ability to mobilize other actors.鈥�

After eight days of fighting, the Palestinian side counted 212 killed 鈥� including more than 60 children 鈥� and hundreds injured in dozens of Israeli airstrikes on Gaza. Israel counted 10 dead, including two children, from more than 3,000 rocket attacks launched from Hamas-controlled Gaza.

The Biden administration last week dispatched Hady Amr, the U.S. deputy assistant secretary for Israeli-Palestinian affairs, to the region to try to encourage a cease-fire that all sides agree will be reached at some point.

But on Monday Mr. Netanyahu insisted that Israel is in no hurry to end its campaign to degrade Hamas鈥� offensive capabilities.

The question now is when (if ever, some wonder) Mr. Biden聽will聽turn up pressure for an end to the fighting, and shift the U.S. to something resembling the traditional arbiter role?聽

The U.S. president who once dubbed himself 鈥淚srael鈥檚 best Catholic friend鈥� is coming under increasing pressure domestically and from abroad to make the move to a more evenhanded position on the conflict.

On Monday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson called on Israel to act more proportionately as it pursues its bombardment of Gaza 鈥� a stance that was viewed by some as tinged with frustration that the U.S.聽has blocked three聽United Nations Security Council resolutions聽calling for聽an end to the violence.

Citing a U.N. report tallying Israeli strikes on 23 schools, 500 homes, and medical facilities, Mr. Johnson鈥檚 spokesman Max Blain said,聽鈥淚srael must make every effort to avoid civilian casualties and military activity must be proportionate.鈥�

Europe is seen by some to be testing the waters of a new reality where the U.S. is no longer the dominant power it once was. 鈥淭he motto is still very much 鈥榩eace can鈥檛 happen without the U.S.鈥� But nor can it happen with only the U.S.,鈥� says Hugh Lovatt, Middle East policy fellow at the London office of the European Council on Foreign Relations.聽

While European pressure for a more nuanced U.S. approach is not聽wholly聽new,聽it comes as Mr. Biden faces unusual and聽mounting pressure from within his own political party to show more support for Palestinians who as usual are suffering disproportionately聽from聽the fighting.

鈥淒o Palestinians have a right to survive?鈥� progressive Democratic House member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Saturday in what was a direct rejoinder to President Biden鈥檚 focus on Israel鈥檚 right to defend itself in the current conflict. 鈥淚f so,鈥� she added, 鈥渨e have a responsibility to that as well.鈥�

The tweet came on the heels of a letter to Mr. Biden, signed by progressive congressional Democrats, accusing him of 鈥渢aking the side of the [Israeli] occupation鈥� of Palestinian territories.

Few observers expect Mr. Biden to bend in his support for Israel in addressing the current conflict. The real question, some say, will be whether the president acknowledges this political pressure by modifying his hands-off approach to the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict once a cease-fire is secured.

鈥淐an [the administration] go back to business as usual with calls from the left flank of its own Democratic Party to address and resolve this conflict, and specifically in some quarters to do so by reforms through a human rights lens?鈥� posits Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen, director of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict program at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) in Washington.

鈥淲e need to be ... fireproofing鈥澛�

Where a wide spectrum of analysts appear to agree is that the Biden administration won鈥檛 be able to simply 鈥済o back鈥� to its initial instincts to set aside the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as unripe for U.S. engagement.

鈥淩eturning to the wider status quo ante will only guarantee future flare-ups,鈥� says the European Council鈥檚 Mr. Lovatt, whose call for a 鈥渞ights-based strategy鈥� to replace the 鈥渃urrent reality of unequal rights and occupation鈥� finds echoes in the U.S. Democratic Party and among a growing number of European officials and regional analysts.

Indeed what Duke鈥檚 Professor Jentleson sees happening in the Biden administration is an awakening to the reality that the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict is never safely ignored.

鈥淭hey鈥檙e going to have to say, 鈥榃e have to stop kidding ourselves. This is a process that is going to take more of our bandwidth than we thought,鈥� says Mr. Jentleson, who says that reevaluation will likely mean naming of a high-level special envoy with access to the Oval Office.

While no one foresees a full-fledged peace process taking up final-status negotiations any time soon, Ms. Kurtzer-Ellenbogen of USIP says the U.S. is going to have to get back in the business of nudging the parties toward practical solutions to the security, political, and economic issues building up like ominous thunder clouds.

鈥淚f we don鈥檛 want to find ourselves in that constant pendulum swing from fire-fighting to ignoring 鈥� we need to be in the active business of fireproofing,鈥� she says. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 going to be the question for the administration as it moves forward.鈥澛犅�