海角大神

Speculation about Donald Trump鈥檚 soft spot for Russian President Vladimir Putin and general pro-Russian attitude has been waxing for several months, helped along by moves such as Mr. Trump's hiring of campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who represented the Russian-backed former Ukrainian president for a decade. And there's his recent comments praising Mr. Putin as 鈥渁 better leader鈥� than Barack Obama.

The flirtation of sorts between the two leaders 鈥� Mr. Putin too has praised Trump 鈥� became the focus of media attention Wednesday when Trump called for Russia to locate emails聽allegedly missing from Hillary Clinton鈥檚 home email server.

The statement triggered some聽damage control from the Trump campaign and his running mate Indiana Gov. Mike Pence聽as well as disapproval on both sides of the party line.

While Trump's campaign has tried to minimize the comment's implications, experts in European geopolitics worry that his pro-Russian stance and open questioning of聽the US commitments to NATO, are causing unease in the former Soviet bloc and the world of international security. Others say that he is raising valid points, although perhaps not in the most constructive manner.

When it comes to the courtship with Putin, at least one expert says that Trump is in over his head.

鈥淢r. Putin is a sophisticated geopolitical strategist whereas Mr. Trump is a novice in the world of foreign affairs,鈥� says Igor Lukes, professor of international relations and history at Boston University's Pardee School of Global Studies.聽While they may be flip comments, Professor Lukes says Trump鈥檚 statements are 鈥渉ugely significant and serious鈥� as they play into Kremlin political strategists鈥� geopolitical game. 鈥淎nd Mr. Trump doesn鈥檛 even know that he is being used in such a manner.鈥�

Nancy Gallagher, interim director at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland,聽has a slightly different take.

鈥淚 think he鈥檚 having fun right now,鈥� she says of Putin in the wake of media speculation that he is meddling in the elections 鈥� an accusation that he has leveraged against the US in Eastern European elections.聽Despite this, she says there is debate among Russians about whether a 鈥渧ery unpredictable鈥� American leader would actually be a boon for Russia.

However, the short-term optics do show reasons for why Putin would prefer Trump as a presidential candidate over another member of the Republican party 鈥� or Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

Unlike many of his Republican peers, Trump is not in favor of arming Ukraine against Russian aggression (in fact the Russian-backed government of annexed Crimea reportedly invited Trump for a visit after he said he was open to discussing their status).

鈥淚f you are the president of an embattled Ukraine under pressure from Russia you could not possibly see this as good news, because in the Ukraine the view is that its salvation lies in a robust NATO,鈥� says Rajan Menon, author of "Ukraine in Conflict: The Unwinding of the Cold War Post-Cold War Order" and professor of political science at The City College of New York. While Ukraine is not part of NATO, there has been ongoing debate within member nations about arming the country against Russia.

And from the perspective of the Ukrainian people, Professor Lukes says, 鈥淚t is tragic to see that your occupation is being legitimized 鈥� the conquest of sovereign territory is being legitimized 鈥� by such an important person as Mr. Trump.鈥�

It鈥檚 not a problem that鈥檚 unique to Ukraine.

For former Soviet countries lining the borders between Russia and the rest of Europe, Trump's pre-presidential hedging on NATO commitments sends 鈥渁 powerful signal that perhaps if there is a major geopolitical emergency鈥� they cannot necessarily rely on NATO, says Lukes.

Putting doubt into citizens and leaders in nations such as Estonia, Lukes says, amplifies the message coming from the other side 鈥渢hat 'Russia is mighty, Russia is there and is not going to go away, and for you to rely on your American friends is simply an illusion.'鈥�

Big picture, this means that Trump鈥檚 questions about NATO, or other international structures, could have serious global security ramifications.

鈥淗e鈥檚 made it clear that if Russia did something that our allies didn鈥檛 like but that he didn鈥檛 consider a direct national security threat to the United States that he might very well say 'you know that鈥檚 on your side of the world ,that鈥檚 your sphere of interest, I鈥檓 not going to get involved,'鈥� says Dr. Gallagher.聽

The problem with that, she says, is that it can invalidate the 鈥渉uge investment鈥� that the United States, Europe, and other nations have made in creating international security organizations 鈥� of which NATO is one example 鈥� that are 鈥渁 function of international law, diplomacy, etc. not purely a function of raw power.鈥�

But while Trump鈥檚 statements have been making waves within domestic politics as well as abroad, his ideas may not actually be as outlandish as some perceive.

Trump鈥檚 comments in regard to NATO are part of a larger debate about burden sharing and alliances within the security organization, whose post-Cold War purpose Professor Menon calls聽鈥渓ess clear.鈥�

鈥淭here have been discussions about these alliances, so Trump鈥檚 rather overstated policy positions feeds into that debate,鈥� says Menon, who himself believes that the current economic system of burden sharing within NATO merits discussion and correction.

But he says that these corrections should be mapped out in an international dialogue 鈥� not off-the-cuff comments.

鈥淓ven those who favor discussion on the future of alliances wouldn鈥檛 go along with bull-horn messages calling into question the American commitment to allies,鈥� he says.