'Tim's Vermeer' is a fascinating story about the artistic process
The documentary directed by Teller tells the story of Tim Jenison, who believes the painter Vermeer used mirrors and lenses to create his work and sets out to try to prove the theory.
The documentary directed by Teller tells the story of Tim Jenison, who believes the painter Vermeer used mirrors and lenses to create his work and sets out to try to prove the theory.
Computer zillionaire Tim Jenison believes that the great Dutch painter Vermeer used a combination of mirrors and lenses to achieve the extraordinary exactitude of his artistry. The remarkable documentary 鈥淭im鈥檚 Vermeer,鈥� directed by Teller with the on-camera participation of his magician partner Penn Jillette, paints a cinematic portrait of their friend Jenison that is part detective story, part art history seminar, and part bromance.
The theory that Vermeer used optical devices to aid his eye has been around a long time 鈥� for example, both David Hockney and author Philip Steadman have written books proposing that Vermeer used a camera obscura. Jenison goes a step further. Fashioning lenses that would have been operative in the 17th century, and reproducing Vermeer's studio in a San Antonio warehouse, he proceeds, over the course of 213 days, to reproduce, brushstroke by brushstroke, a famous Vermeer canvas, right down to the costumes and the stained-glass windows.
The final result is graphically faithful to the original to a remarkable degree. Does this mean that Jenison is right about Vermeer? And if so, does it detract from Vermeer鈥檚 genius to say that he used mechanical devices to achieve his ends?
The movie doesn鈥檛 delve very deeply into these aesthetic questions, and perhaps this is just as well. It鈥檚 all about the artistic process, not the meaning of the process. (Watch Orson Welles鈥檚 documentary 鈥淔 for Fake鈥� for a definitive movie about the nature of forgery.)
When I interviewed Jenison at the Toronto film festival, I asked him to play devil鈥檚 advocate against his theory. How he could prove himself wrong? He said there were three reigning possibilities: First, no documentation of any kind exists from that time to prove his theory. Second, even though Jenison鈥檚 reproductions are amazing, that doesn鈥檛 prove Vermeer used lenses. The third possibility is that Jenison, who has shown no previous artistic talent, is in fact, a painter of genius. None of these seem likely.
What matters in the end for Jenison 鈥� who believes Vermeer was a genius in any case 鈥� is the work itself. However these great paintings came about, they exist apart from the method used to create them, and for all time. And of course, Vermeer鈥檚 compositions, so integral to to their power, were not created by an assortment of lenses. What 鈥淭im鈥檚 Vermeer鈥� is really about is two geniuses, of very different sorts, communing across time and space. Grade: A- (Unrated.)