The history of 鈥榗ompetition鈥 won鈥檛 cooperate
It's possible to argue the roots of 'competition' imply some sort of cooperation. But the word's history is all about defeating an opponent.
It's possible to argue the roots of 'competition' imply some sort of cooperation. But the word's history is all about defeating an opponent.
During the Olympics, athletes compete for the gold medal in each sport. It would seem that competition is a battle, a zero-sum game in which there is only one winner. But in recent years, in an attempt to put a more positive spin on the word, authors and athletes have mined 肠辞尘辫别迟颈迟颈辞苍鈥檚 etymology, looking for a more cooperative definition in which participants spur each other to improve, to perform at their highest level.聽 聽
For example, in his book, 鈥淭he Heart of Running,鈥 triathlete Kevin Everett explains that competition derives from the Latin com- (鈥渢ogether鈥) and petere (鈥渢o seek鈥). Competition is thus 鈥渢o strive together for the attainment of something. ... True competition is striving for excellence together.鈥 This is a wonderful reframing of what it means to compete 鈥 but is this the actual origin of the word, and does it matter?
The etymology Mr. Everett supplies is misleading. Com- does indeed mean 鈥渨ith鈥 in Latin, and one meaning of petere is 鈥渢o seek鈥 鈥 it is the source of the English word petition, a formal request. Going back even further, however, the root pet- indicated 鈥渢o rush, to fly鈥 or 鈥渢o fall upon.鈥 This endowed petere with many meanings: 鈥渢o attack,鈥 鈥渢o let fly [a spear, etc.]鈥 鈥渢o embrace鈥 (as in 鈥渢o fall upon one鈥檚 neck鈥), 鈥渢o beg, entreat,鈥 as well as 鈥渢o seek.鈥 Thinking about聽competition as 鈥渁ttacking together鈥 is, however, not as inspiring.
There are a few instances where com+petere produces a verb that can be defined as 鈥渢o strive after something ... in company or together,鈥 but these are not found in classical Latin and are 鈥渧ery rare,鈥 according to Lewis & Short鈥檚 Latin dictionary. The noun competitor was more common, especially in a political context. In ancient Rome you didn鈥檛 鈥渞un for鈥 office, you would 鈥渟eek鈥 it, so a candidate was called a petitor. The other candidates were your competitors, since they were seeking the same office 鈥渨ith鈥 you. Though a literal translation of competitor is 鈥渃o-seeker,鈥 the Latin word had no connotations of working together.聽
Redefining the word competition as 鈥渟triving together for a common goal鈥 seems to be cherry picking the evidence. It is also an example of what philologists and philosophers call the etymological fallacy, 鈥渢he idea that knowing about a word鈥檚 origin, and particularly its original meaning, gives us the key to understanding its present-day use,鈥 according to the Oxford Handbook of Etymology.
Like many writers, I am drawn to re-imagining competition as a cooperative process that raises everybody up, rather than a battle that leaves only one standing. We鈥檒l have to look beyond the word鈥檚 history to support that argument.