海角大神

During the countdown to the Oscars, the behind-the-scenes narratives arising about the nominees and earlier winners in the awards season are watched closely. And sometimes, they have as much impact on who takes home statuettes as the films themselves.

Nearly every year, there are 鈥渢he snubbed,鈥� the 鈥渃omeback kids,鈥� the 鈥渄ark horses,鈥� and sentimental favorites, among other familiar archetypes.

鈥淭his is an industry of storytellers,鈥� points out Matt McDaniel, the Los Angeles-based managing editor of Yahoo! Movies. Spinning stories 鈥渋s what everyone here does.鈥�

This year, much of the talk has centered on the 鈥淟incoln鈥�-鈥淎rgo鈥� face-off 鈥� which most critics think are the top two contenders for Best Picture. As is often the case, the discussions have gone beyond the single efforts to an evaluation of entire careers.

2013鈥檚 most passionately pitied 鈥渟nub鈥� 鈥� in case you have been reading about Oscar Pistorius in South Africa instead of the Oscars 鈥� is 鈥淎rgo鈥� director Ben Affleck. After he collected Golden Globes for both director and best film, the town issued a collective gasp when he was passed over for directing in the Academy Award nominations.

Everyone assumed Mr. Affleck would be a shoo-in for Best Director, says Stephen Brown, a marketing professional in Atlanta. 鈥淗e made an outstanding movie, plus he overcame a challenging decade of paparazzi and bad-movie-fueled malaise,鈥� he says via e-mail. Hollywood generally loves to reward talent it discovered when young, he says, pointing to Affleck鈥檚 1998 Oscar for 鈥淕ood Will Hunting.鈥�

The industry particularly likes the comeback story, Mr. Brown says, adding that in this case, because of the shoo-in assumption and the subsequent snub, many academy voters are seeing a Best Picture Oscar for 鈥淎rgo.鈥�

But voters do not like to be told what to do, says University of Nebraska film professor Wheeler Winston Dixon, who has many former students in Hollywood. Efforts to sway votes have become particularly aggressive 鈥� a phenomenon that seriously ratcheted up in 1999 when producer Harvey Weinstein reportedly shelled out more than $15 million in support of 鈥淪hakespeare in Love.鈥�

The academy has since cracked down on splashy spending, banning swanky screening soirees for the roughly 5,800 academy members who vote.

Voting for this year鈥檚 Oscars closed Tuesday night. Steven Spielberg, director of 鈥淟incoln,鈥� was reported to have sent handwritten notes to voters, while a commemorative DVD of 鈥淎rgo鈥� was delivered to academy members.

Although he leans toward 鈥淎rgo鈥� winning Best Picture, Professor Dixon says 鈥淟incoln鈥� has a good chance, 鈥渂ecause of this pushback鈥� against influence peddling.

Mr. Spielberg himself has been in Affleck鈥檚 position, notes Dixon, pointing to the 鈥淛aws鈥� Best Picture nod in 1976, when the director was not nominated. 鈥淎 lot of people said, who do they think directed the film, the shark?鈥� Dixon quips.

Spielberg鈥檚 own narrative can work for and against him, points out Lester Friedman, film professor and chair of the media and society department at Hobart and William Smith Colleges in Geneva, N.Y. His work redefined filmmaking. After 鈥淛aws,鈥� studios began to focus on the 鈥渂lockbuster,鈥� films costing $100 million and more. This has significantly reduced the money left for smaller, more-independent projects, Professor Friedman notes.

Yet Spielberg has also made a career of serious, historical pictures such as 鈥淪chindler鈥檚 List鈥� and 鈥淪aving Private Ryan.鈥� He received Oscars for both films.

While some may feel that 鈥淟incoln鈥� belongs in that pantheon, Friedman suggests that the tale of the 16th president鈥檚 struggle to pass the 13th Amendment 鈥渟hould be remembered as one of his good, but not great films.鈥�