海角大神

海角大神 / Text

Will new EPA power plant rules trade carbon for methane?

The Environmental Protection Agency鈥檚 new regulations for reducing carbon emissions may mean more methane emissions, writes Cunningham. Natural gas may burn cleaner than coal, but what happens when it isn't burned?

By Nick Cunningham , Guest blogger

The Environmental Protection Agency鈥檚聽new regulations聽aimed at reducing carbon emissions by 30 percent will no doubt lead to a cleaner economy. But the road there will be paved with methane.

By requiring reductions in the energy intensity per megawatt-hour of electricity generation, utilities will have the ability to choose from an array of options for how to meet the targets.

Energy efficiency will likely be the first choice. Renewable energy will certainly play a big part, as well.

But one of the major ways utilities will comply with EPA rules is by fuel switching from coal to natural gas. By the EPA鈥檚 own estimate, coal generation will decline by 20 percent to 22 percent by 2020. That will create an opening for natural gas, which could rise by up to聽45 percent, jumping from 22 billion cubic feet per day to 32 bcf/d.

The Obama administration has bet its climate legacy on this trend, which was already underway before the EPA regulations. This is why the administration chose 2005 as a baseline, when emissions were near a peak. 2005 predated the shale gas revolution, which led to significant reductions in carbon dioxide emissions as cheap natural gas displaced coal. By 2013, the U.S. had already achieved about a 10 percent reduction in emissions since 2005 鈥 meaning we are already well on our way to the 2030 goal.

Since natural gas burns much cleaner than coal, producing about聽half as much carbon dioxide, making the switch from coal to gas can go a long way to achieving the rest of the remaining reductions, the administration seems to be thinking.

The big problem is that we don鈥檛 know what鈥檚 happening with methane emissions. Natural gas, which is essentially methane (CH4), may burn cleaner than coal, but what happens when it isn鈥檛 burned? As a greenhouse gas, methane emitted into the atmosphere is more than聽20 times聽as potent as carbon dioxide over a 100-year period.

Natural gas production leaks methane along its entire supply chain 鈥 from drilling to storing, processing to distributing. The EPA estimates that methane emissions have聽actually declined聽over the past 20 years as technology has improved. And this needs to be true for the EPA鈥檚 assumptions to work out with its climate plan. (Related Article:聽As EPA Launches War On Emissions, U.S. Plays Catch Up With Europe On Renewables)

The problem is that many scientists dispute those claims.聽Robert Howarth of Cornell University聽believes that methane leakage could be much higher than the government says, which would mean pushing utilities to switch from coal to natural gas may not be constructive. He has conducted studies that conclude methane leakage far exceeds EPA estimates. 鈥淐onverting to natural gas plants, which is what this latest rule is likely to do, will actually aggravate climate change, not make things better,鈥澛燞owarth told Bloomberg News. 鈥淚t鈥檚 well enough established to suggest the EPA is on the wrong side of the science.鈥

The natural gas industry has aggressively pushed back against Howarth鈥檚 findings, pointing to聽other studies聽that show lower methane leakage. But the problem is that the science just isn鈥檛 all there yet 鈥 we don鈥檛 know exactly how much methane is leaking. Nevertheless, the Obama administration is ploughing forward.

In its regulatory analysis for the new carbon rule, the EPA recognized the methane problem, but has punted on the issue for now. 鈥淭he EPA is aware that other GHGs such as nitrous oxide (N2O) (and to a lesser extent, methane [CH4]) may be emitted from fossil-fuel-fired EGUs鈥he EPA is not proposing separate N2O or CH4 guidelines or an equivalent CO2 emission limit because of a lack of available data for these affected sources,鈥 the聽report聽said.

Natural gas may still have a climate benefit over coal. And even if it doesn鈥檛 right now, methane leakage could turn out to be a very fixable problem, as engineers figure out how to plug the leaks in the supply chain. But for now, President Barack Obama鈥檚 climate plan hinges on this uncertainty.

厂辞耻谤肠别:听丑迟迟辫://辞颈濒辫谤颈肠别.肠辞尘/贰苍别谤驳测/贰苍别谤驳测-骋别苍别谤补濒/翱产补尘补蝉-颁濒颈尘补迟别-笔濒补苍-滨蝉-尝别补办颈苍驳-惭别迟丑补苍别.丑迟尘濒