Why you should talk about climate change 鈥 even if you disagree
Disagreement on climate change can often stifle conversation.听Must the discussion stop when we start butting heads?
Disagreement on climate change can often stifle conversation.听Must the discussion stop when we start butting heads?
The majority of Americans accept human-caused climate change as reality. National surveys report 70% of the country thinks this way. The catch: Only 3 in 10 Americans actually talk about climate change.听
This 鈥渃limate silence,鈥 observers say, is hampering our ability to take the steps needed to keep global warming in check at a time when calls from scientists are becoming increasingly urgent. The latest United Nations Emissions Gap Report听recommends drastic global action: Cut greenhouse gas emissions by 7.6% every year for the next decade.
This global challenge requires creative thinking and collaboration from as many people as possible, climate experts say. Across the country, academics, climate advocates, and community leaders are finding ways to keep conversations afloat by harnessing hope, trust, and shared values.
Conspiring to convince skeptical friends and family about climate change isn鈥檛 the right attitude, says Ed Maibach, director of George Mason University鈥檚 Center for Climate Change Communication.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 try to change their opinion,鈥 he says. Instead, he shares his own concerns about what climate change will mean for communities and the planet.
鈥淎 way of approaching these conversations is simply to share what we know and what we feel and why we care,鈥 he says.听
Intending to sway minds through these discussions can cause people to become defensive or disengage, says Tina Johnson, former policy director at U.S. Climate Action Network.
鈥淚t has to be a two-way conversation,鈥 she says. 鈥淚f we can鈥檛 hear from each other, we鈥檙e never going to trust each other enough to believe what [the other is] saying.鈥
Starting on common ground
One way to establish trust is to explore shared values.听
Climate change initially gained traction with environmentalists because it was framed as an environmental challenge. Reframing the discussion in terms of human health and well-being can open the door for people who aren鈥檛 inherently interested in the plight of 鈥減lants, penguins, and polar bears,鈥 says Dr. Maibach, who partners with Yale University鈥檚 Program on Climate Change Communication.
Karin Kirk, a geologist who writes for Yale Climate Connections, inserts another value into climate conversations: patriotism. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a lot of common ground to talk about American innovation, and I think that鈥檚 a really easy point to be proud of,鈥 she says, citing a new 鈥渉ydro battery鈥 energy storage system planned for her home state of Montana.
The conservative American Conservation Coalition also prizes innovation, favoring market-based solutions to the environment and climate change with limited government. While Democrats are most known for supporting climate change action, the organization seeks to engage young conservatives 鈥 a group that increasingly supports climate action. Pew Research found young conservatives more prone than older party members to say the government isn鈥檛 doing enough to protect the climate 鈥 52% of millennials or younger, compared with 31% of boomers and older.听
Quill Robinson, government affairs director for the American Conservation Coalition, works to unearth values that are hard to disagree with.听
鈥淓verybody can agree that they want clean air and clean water,鈥 says Mr. Robinson. For years, Republicans thought environmentalists had to sport 鈥淏irkenstocks, a tie-dye shirt, and patchouli,鈥 he says, but that image is eroding.
鈥淪ome of our biggest allies in Congress are the younger members who represent coastal districts, who are already feeling the impact of climate change,鈥 he says.
鈥淎mong young people, it鈥檚 less a debate over if climate change is a thing. It鈥檚 more and more what do we do about it,鈥 says Mr. Robinson, a millennial himself. 鈥淲e鈥檝e grown up with the science.鈥
A range of perspectives听
Climate communicators take inspiration from an old marketing adage: Know your audience.
Public opinion on climate change doesn鈥檛 split neatly between 鈥渂elievers鈥 and 鈥渄eniers.鈥 Such stark labels can be divisive by forcing people into artificial categories.听
Researchers from Yale and George Mason instead break down the spectrum of U.S. perspectives on humanity鈥檚 role in climate change into 鈥淪ix Americas鈥 鈥 ranging from dismissive (9%) to alarmed (29%, an all-time high). The largest share of the public 鈥 3 out of 10 鈥 are concerned. They see climate change as a serious but distant threat, unlikely to affect them.听
听
Fostering constructive dialogue across perspectives can be difficult if the two parties don鈥檛 already share an established sense of trust. That鈥檚 why people who discuss global warming with friends and family 鈥 trusted sources 鈥 are more prone to learn key facts, like the scientific consensus on climate change, according to Dr. Maibach鈥檚 research.
The Rev. Dr. Ambrose Carroll, pastor at The Church by the Side of the Road in Berkeley, California, sees faith leaders as prime facilitators for such discussions since they can be trusted influencers in their communities. The Baptist minister founded the Green The Church movement in 2010 to reclaim environmental justice and sustainability as projects of African American churches.听
鈥淲e have not seen ourselves as a part of the environmental movement,鈥 he says, 鈥渂ecause the history of the movement says that the fauna and the flora ... to some degree, has seemed more important than the lives of African people and people of color.鈥
His network engages communities of color while recognizing they face other challenges beyond just a changing climate. Through efforts like energy audits and recycling, the campaign links 鈥済reen theology鈥 with sustainable practices and advocates for political and economic empowerment.听
Hope over fear
As observed changes and scientific projections for rising seas and soaring temperatures听grow more dire, a sense of empowerment can feel elusive. As a policy consultant, Ms. Johnson has learned that 鈥渨e have to show where progress is being made, and why it鈥檚 being made.鈥
If you鈥檙e talking about renewable technologies like solar panels or wind farms, she says, these ideas must be relatable to your audience.
鈥淒oes it save us money? Does it lower our bills? How are we communicating the benefits of this to communities ... so they can start thinking, 鈥極h, I want to be a part of that鈥?鈥 she says. When Dr. Carroll鈥檚 church began recycling, it shaved $4,000 off its yearly refuse bill.
Conversation is also seen as a path toward political action. Dr. Maibach says the most important thing for concerned citizens to do is urge politicians to become climate hawks if they want votes.
鈥淭he more that voters make that clear to elected officials,鈥 he says, 鈥渢he better our chances are of actually making a difference on this problem.鈥澨
While Ms. Johnson urges action, she sees hope in difficult discussions: 鈥淏eing comfortable 鈥 and being uncomfortable 鈥 in those conversations I think will get us a lot further than just throwing up our hands.鈥
And being civil doesn鈥檛 hurt.
鈥淣o angry words,鈥 says Ms. Kirk. 鈥淲e鈥檝e got 150 years of amazing science on our side.鈥