In high court case, a delicate web of emotions
"It鈥檚 about children, about child welfare. It鈥檚 about historical injustice and trauma,鈥� our reporter tells the Monitor's Why We Wrote This podcast.
"It鈥檚 about children, about child welfare. It鈥檚 about historical injustice and trauma,鈥� our reporter tells the Monitor's Why We Wrote This podcast.
Who gets to decide what鈥檚 in a child鈥檚 best interests?
That鈥檚 the question at the heart of a case that鈥檚 now before the U.S. Supreme Court, and of a recent cover story by Henry Gass.
Brackeen v. Haaland centers on the Indian Child Welfare Act, or ICWA, a law passed by Congress in 1978 that prioritizes placement of Native children with Native families when it comes to adoption or foster care. At its core, the law is an effort to protect the child鈥檚 sense of identity, culture, and belonging.
Indeed, ICWA first arose as an act of restitution for policies dating back to the 1800s that removed Native children from their tribal communities and placed them into private facilities. These were 鈥渋ntentional efforts to break up Native tribes and erode their culture by assimilation,鈥� Henry tells me in an interview for the Monitor podcast 鈥淲hy We Wrote This.鈥�
But in practice, the prioritization of placement within Native communities has not necessarily led to the best outcomes for children, several plaintiffs in the case argue. One of Henry鈥檚 sources says she was shuttled between nine or 10 foster homes over 11 years. They were all nominally Native families, but she says many of the homes didn鈥檛 feel very Native to her.聽
鈥淭his case is very emotional. It鈥檚 about children, about child welfare. It鈥檚 also about tribal sovereignty. You know, it鈥檚 about historical injustice and trauma,鈥� Henry says.聽
鈥淚 think one of the things that makes this case so challenging is that everyone has the best interests of the children at heart,鈥� he adds. 鈥淭hey just maybe disagree on what those best interests are.鈥�
For Henry, an experienced justice reporter, that underscored the need to approach coverage with an eye toward nuance. He had to look at competing child-placement preferences, competing views of what impact children鈥檚 cultural environments have on their well-being, and competing views of what鈥檚 in their 鈥渂est interests.鈥� And he had to gather each of these perspectives with care and compassion.
鈥淪o it鈥檚 all the more important to talk with every person involved in a nonjudgmental way,鈥� he says. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e telling their truth, their lived experience. And it鈥檚 my duty to listen nonjudgmentally and transmit that as best as I can.鈥�
To hear my full interview with Henry, visit www.CSMonitor.com/ICWA.