海角大神

海角大神 / Text

Boeing has apologized. Now comes test of honing culture of safety.

As Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg testifies before Congress this week, some say the company鈥檚 culture allowed safety lapses to occur.

By Laurent Belsie, Staff writer

A month before Lion Air Flight 610 took off from Jakarta and promptly plunged into the Java Sea, killing everyone aboard, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg traveled to a Baptist church in southern Illinois to talk about faith and leadership.

He talked about his boyhood on an Iowa farm and what he learned from a particularly challenging two-year stint where he had to dismantle a business unit that Boeing had expected to be a growth opportunity. 鈥淚 firmly believe I wouldn鈥檛 have the job I鈥檓 in today without that experience,鈥 he told the lunchtime audience. 鈥淧art of being a leader, I think, is being willing to take risk, smart risk, and sometimes fail but then learn and become a better leader.鈥澛犅

This week, Mr. Muilenburg had the chance to tell two congressional panels what he had learned from a much bigger challenge聽鈥嬧 the crashes of Boeing 737 MAX planes in Indonesia and in Ethiopia less than five months later. It was dramatic political theater, with families of some of the 346 victims sitting a few feet behind him. It was also his opportunity to demonstrate moral leadership聽鈥嬧 something he鈥檚 committed himself to, and that most American workers say is lacking in their own companies.

鈥淭he thirst for moral leadership, especially from individuals who occupy positions of formal leadership, senior positions ... continues to be high,鈥 says Dov Seidman, the founder and chairman of LRN, a New York-based company that provides software and also advises companies on leadership and ethical cultures.

But only 17% of American workers say their managers normally tell the truth, according to an LRN survey last year. Only 14% of workers say leaders acknowledge their own failings, and only 13% say leaders make amends when they get things wrong, the survey found.

For Boeing, there is plenty to apologize for in the aftermath of the twin crashes of its new plane. Various safety reviews have pointed out the airplane software鈥檚 overreliance on a single sensor, overoptimistic assumptions about pilots鈥 emergency response, and the fateful decision to push regulators to allow the plane to keep flying after the first crash, which occurred in October 2018.聽

Boeing鈥檚 Mr. Muilenburg acknowledged these problems over two days of congressional testimony, first at a Senate panel and on Wednesday, before a House committee. He said he met with some of the victims鈥 family members to hear their stories, and in a dramatic moment at the House hearing, he turned to them and addressed them directly: 鈥淲e are deeply sorry.鈥

But the key to a true apology is not just acknowledging the offense and offering a genuine apology, writes Aaron Lazare, in his 2004 book 鈥淥n Apology.鈥 The follow-on is to 鈥渙ffer appropriate reparations, including a commitment to make changes in the future.鈥

Boeing has set up a fund to help families of the victims, and it has repeatedly stated it has made the changes to fix the current problem and will continue to learn. It has also created a new channel for employees to raise safety concerns.聽

Is it enough?

From an engineering point of view, some experts say the answer is yes. 鈥淭he problem is relatively well understood. The fixes are also well understood.鈥 I actually don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 that productive to do much fingerpointing,鈥 says John Hansman, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.聽

From a leadership point of view, it鈥檚 less clear that the company has executed a fundamental聽 change.聽

For any company in crisis, 鈥測ou have to pause and do some form of moral audit and ask very deep questions,鈥 says Mr. Seidman. 鈥淗ave we put in place incentives聽鈥嬧 such as being the biggest or being No. 1 or beating a competitor or making more profit than anybody else聽鈥嬧 that had more primacy than our principles and doing the right thing?鈥澛

A handful of Boeing whistleblowers have raised issues with the 737 MAX and its safety. And the House committee says an internal company survey showed roughly one-third of workers described 鈥減otential undue pressure鈥 from managers regarding safety-related approvals by federal regulators across an array of commercial planes. Workload and schedule were cited as important causes. The plane is still grounded, although U.S. clearance to fly could come in the next few months.

Mr. Muilenberg has defended the company culture as putting safety first. But in his testimony to Congress, he repeatedly earned rebukes from members of Congress for not answering questions directly.

Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois accused the company of pushing 鈥渉alf-truths.鈥 Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas suggested the corporate culture was too complacent or too scared to alert its CEO to potentially damning documents.

鈥淭here鈥檚 been a lack of candor through all this,鈥 Rep. Peter DeFazio, an Oregon Democrat and chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, said in his opening statement.

鈥淚 can鈥檛 say whether he鈥檚 sincere or insincere,鈥 says Mike Perrone, president of the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists, an AFL-CIO union representing some 11,000 Federal Aviation Adminsitration (FAA) inspectors as well as technicians who maintain and certify air-traffic-control and national defense equipment聽

The union is pushing for a pause in the expansion of the FAA program under which Boeing workers increasingly certify their own components and systems. 鈥淟et鈥檚 take a breath; let鈥檚 figure out what鈥檚 broken,鈥 Mr. Perrone says.聽 聽

Mr. Muilenburg鈥檚 interest in leadership extends beyond Boeing. He also is chairman of a nonprofit in the St Louis area called Biblical Business Training. 鈥淲ith the growing crisis of character of leadership in the workplace, I believe that God expects me to glorify Him to the benefit of others,鈥 he writes on the group鈥檚 website. 鈥淎s a 海角大神, I take God to work with me every day and strive to lead in a way that is faithful.鈥

鈥淭here are different paths to values,鈥 says Mr. Seidman of LRN. Some get there through religion; some through universal humanist values; some through a natural empathy. 鈥淭he values that moral leaders have in common is that they put values at the foundation.鈥

He adds: 鈥淥ften, we know that somebody is doing the right thing because they鈥檙e doing something inconvenient, unpopular, unprofitable in the short term, or dangerous. And I yearn for a world where doing the right thing doesn鈥檛 take so much courage.鈥

[Editor's note:聽One quote has been corrected, making clear that beating a competitor could be an incentive.闭听