海角大神

海角大神 / Text

US coal consumption is still dropping. How could a call to bring coal back work?

Coal consumption in the US dropped for the third year in a row. But international demand for the energy source could breathe new life and stability into the industry.聽

By Amanda Hoover, Staff

Coal consumption in the United States dropped by 9 percent last year as America shifted its energy use toward natural gas and clean energy.

Energy consumption in the US continues to rise but its sourcing is changing, says a report released by the US Energy Information Administration last week. Fossil fuels remain the dominant source of energy in the country, still making up 81 percent of nationwide energy use. Renewables, petroleum, natural gas, and nuclear fuel have all picked up聽as coal consumption declined for a third year in a row.

The 2016 shift is part of a slow, ongoing decline in fossil fuels (which stood at 86 percent of US energy use in 2005), rooted in rising efficiency and competitive pricing among various types of energy.

And it comes as President Trump, who won the 2016 election in part by garnering support in places where jobs in the coal industry once brought middle-class lifestyles to workers without college degrees, promises to revive the industry and create new jobs. Democrats and environmentalists, on the other hand, have pushed for training in new sectors and emphasized the benefits of clean, renewable sources.

While changing trends might make the idea of a full revival out of reach, that doesn鈥檛 mean forays into coal are a wash.

鈥淲e鈥檙e not going to see a dramatic recovery in coal jobs, because the industry has become very efficient and highly automated, so you don鈥檛 need as many coal miners to produce a ton of coal as you did a decade ago,鈥 Bernard Weinstein, associate director of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, tells 海角大神 in a phone interview. 鈥淚n terms of keeping the coal industry relatively healthy or at least slowing its decline, I believe the real opportunity is in exports.鈥

That would require the construction of international coal exporting facilities, which several companies have spent the better part of the past decade trying to establish. Often met with opposition from local residents and environmental groups, the efforts have stalled, but could see some success with the support of Mr. Trump, Dr. Weinstein says.

Domestically in 2016, petroleum consumption increased because of higher demand in transportation, while natural gas was used at increasing rates in the electric power and industrial sectors, the report notes. Coal dropped in use in both the electric power and industrial coal sectors.

And that decrease in domestic consumption is to be expected, Weinstein says. But it doesn鈥檛 have to facilitate a steady hit to economies dependent on coal.

鈥淲hile coal use for power generation will likely continue to decline in the US, foreign use of coal is going to continue to grow at least until the year 2030, or 2035,鈥 he predicted, noting that fast-growing countries such as China will continue to rely on coal. Studies have shown that coal is likely to remain the second-largest energy source worldwide in coming years, and that international consumption continues to climb annually. 聽聽

Still, a significant revival of communities long dependent on coal聽isn鈥檛 likely to come from the energy source alone, and coal-mining communities are coming to that realization. As 海角大神鈥檚 Zack Colman reported in a cover story聽this month, some communities, like towns in Kentucky that once thrived under coal, are trying to leave behind the lure of the mines for new avenues. Here, younger residents care less about the singular coal industry, and more about the goal of diverse and stable jobs in various sectors within their communities.