海角大神

On Friday we reported on the pastor who reportedly used church funds to buy his way onto the New York Times bestseller list, setting off a firestorm of criticism and controversy.

As we reported, Pastor Mark Driscoll of Mars Hill Church in Seattle reportedly paid marketing company ResultSource more than $200,000 to artificially place his book, 鈥淩eal Marriage,鈥� on the elite bestseller list. World Magazine reporter Warren Cole Smith, who broke the story, called it 鈥渄istasteful if not immoral鈥� and pushed the pastor for an explanation.

On Friday, Mars Hill Church responded to the negative coverage.

鈥淚n 2011, outside counsel advised our marketing team to use Result Source to market the Real Marriage book and attain placement on the New York Times Bestseller list. While not uncommon or illegal, this unwise strategy is not one we had used before or since, and not one we will use again,鈥� the Church said in a statement posted on its website.

It continued, 鈥淎ll monies from the sale of Pastor Mark鈥檚 books at Mars Hill bookstores have always gone to the church and Pastor Mark did not profit from the Real Marriage books sold either at the church or through the Result Source marketing campaign.鈥�

The church also said the 鈥渢rue cost鈥� of the marketing campaign was 鈥渕uch less鈥� than what was reported in World Magazine 鈥� about $210,000. However, it didn鈥檛 say what the actual cost was.

While Driscoll has remained mum on the subject, an article in the 海角大神 Post reports that his recent Sunday sermon struck an apologetic tone.

"I love you (the church) very much and I want to do the best job that I can, and I'm devastated when I don't," said Driscoll during a sermon about the power of "the tongue." "Jesus gave His best and you deserve the best."

But while the church鈥檚 statement and Driscoll鈥檚 sermon appears apologetic, a post on the religious site patheos.com suggests a significant change of message following the intense interest Driscoll鈥檚 book garnered.

As Patheos reported, when the bestselling scheme was first reported on March 5, Mars Hill Church defended the practice. In World Magazine鈥檚 article, the church鈥檚 communication director Justin Dean made this statement:

鈥淢ars Hill has made marketing investments for book releases and sermon series, along with album releases, events, and church plants, much like many other churches, authors, and publishers who want to reach a large audience. We will explore any opportunity that helps us to get that message out, while striving to remain above reproach in the process. Whether we鈥檙e talking about technology, music, marketing, or whatever, we want to tell lots of people about Jesus by every means available. That鈥檚 what we鈥檙e all about and have been since 1996.鈥�

As Patheos wrote, the initial statement and the one published after the news exploded in the blogosphere represent very different reactions, describing the use of ResultSource as 鈥渁n opportunity,鈥� and two days later, 鈥渁n unwise strategy,鈥� for example.

鈥淸O]n this point, they have increased the confusion and left important questions unanswered,鈥� writes Patheos poster Warren Throckmorton.

And while questions remain in this particular instance of publishing foul play, we can鈥檛 help but hope that for those considering such practices it rings a warning bell 鈥� and perhaps, for phony marketing campaigns, a death knell.

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.