海角大神

Has proof surfaced that legendary playwright William Shakespeare wrote a section of Thomas Kyd鈥檚 play 鈥淭he Spanish Tragedy鈥�?

Scholars have long debated whether 325 lines of the Elizabethan drama were written by the Bard. The original script, which is attributed to Kyd and dates from the late 1500s, had several sections added to a 1602 quarto printed after Kyd's death.

And now University of Texas professor Douglas Bruster is saying that he has new evidence that the lines were penned by Shakespeare. What had looked like some clumsy and un-Shakespearean verbiage is just a printer's mistake, argues Bruster, that occurred when the printer misread Shakespeare's handwriting.

For example, one part of the text printed inserts a confusing 鈥淚, or yet鈥� at the end of a sentence, a phrase which doesn鈥檛 seem to make sense where it鈥檚 put in the speech. The awkwardness of this language is one of the reasons scholars have argued that the lines could not have been written by Shakespeare.

But Bruster thinks Shakespeare wrote 鈥淚er,鈥� indicating that the character Hieronimo (a name sometimes written during that time period as Ieronimo) was speaking, and the printers misinterpreted his words.

鈥淥nce you realize that it鈥檚 Shakespeare鈥檚 handwriting that鈥檚 responsible for the misreading, it鈥檚 no longer a bad line,鈥� Bruster said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 actually a gorgeous passage.鈥�

Bruster says he has been able to determine that the writing in "Tragedy" resembles Shakespeare's by examining pages in the British Museum that are believed to have been written by the playwright.

鈥淲hat we鈥檝e got here isn鈥檛 bad writing, but bad handwriting,鈥� he told the New York Times.

In 2012, British professor Brian Vickers used a computer to examine the text and said his research concluded the lines were written by Shakespeare.

University of Nevada, Reno professor Eric Rasmussen said the combination of evidence may be as close as the scholarly world will come to definitive proof that the lines were written by England鈥檚 most famous playwright.

聽鈥淚 think we can now say with some authority that, yes, this is Shakespeare,鈥� Rasmussen, who also serves as co-editor of the complete Shakespeare edition of the Royal Shakespeare Company, said. 鈥淚t has his fingerprints all over it.鈥� He said he and his co-editor Jonathan Bate will be adding 鈥淭ragedy鈥� to the new edition this fall.

As pointed out by the New York Times, one playwright helping another with a script or writing portions for another鈥檚 play would have been normal during Shakespeare鈥檚 day, which saw many writers working together in the the theater.聽

But some scholars are preaching caution.

鈥淭he arguments for 鈥楾he Spanish Tragedy鈥� are better than for most,鈥� Oxford University drama professor Tiffany Stern told the NYT. 鈥淏ut I think we鈥檙e going a bit Shakespeare-attribution crazy and shoving a lot of stuff in that maybe shouldn鈥檛 be there.鈥�