海角大神

Presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin long ago established herself as a writer with the most enviable of careers. Nothing can compare to Goodwin鈥檚 role as one of the most revered in a long line of biographers of America鈥檚 16th president, Abraham Lincoln. Seven years ago, Goodwin published 鈥淭eam of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln,鈥� a highly successful work now back in the spotlight as the basis of Steven Spielberg鈥檚 new movie 鈥淟incoln.鈥� Goodwin talked with the Monitor鈥檚 Erik Spanberg about the movie, her role in the making of it, and her next book. Here are excerpts of their conversation.

Q: How does it feel to have 鈥淭eam of Rivals鈥� back in the headlines?

It鈥檚 been a wild ride.... I finished the book in 2005 and [Steven] Spielberg got the rights to it in 2000. And it just happened luckily to come out during this time of the lame-duck session [of Congress] so that it sends a connection. We never could have imagined [how timely it would be] so many years ago, when both of us took so long to make the book and the movie.

Q: How did your book catch Spielberg鈥檚 attention?听

Spielberg has always wanted to make a movie about Lincoln. It predated my book or my involvement. It鈥檚 been in his heart for a long time. I met [Spielberg], actually, in 1999.... And when he found out that I was doing a book on Lincoln 鈥� I was four years into the book at that time 鈥� he said, 鈥淲ill you shake hands and I鈥檒l get the first look at it when you鈥檙e done?鈥� So, of course, I said yes. He decided [later] to acquire the rights, even though I was four years away from finishing.
听

Q: What is your relationship with Spielberg like?

He鈥檚 so warm and accessible that you feel like you know him even after you鈥檝e met him just one or two times.听

Q: What was your involvement with the movie?听

The first thing was I got to know and become great friends with [screenwriter] Tony Kushner. So I鈥檝e seen the various scripts from the beginning, ranging from ones that were much longer, covering a much longer period of time, down to this final, really smart decision to focus on those last four months. As soon as Daniel Day-Lewis agreed to take the role of Lincoln, and even before he was announced, Spielberg asked if I would take him to Springfield [Ill.] because [Day-Lewis] wanted to go through Lincoln鈥檚 house and his law office and see all the documents.... It [meant] so much to him. I can remember still when we went through Lincoln鈥檚 house and a lot of the ceilings are low in it. But more importantly ... he remembered the carpet and the wallpaper were so busy that he felt claustrophobic and he couldn鈥檛 wait to get out of the house. Which is how Lincoln felt. He was already absorbing it.

Q: What was it like on the set?

I went down to the filming in Richmond [Va.]. To see characters you鈥檝e been living with for 10 years in your imagination now suddenly costumed and speaking lines that you know they actually said in real life and knowing that Daniel had mastered Lincoln鈥檚 voice, that high-pitched voice. And he had figured out the walk 鈥� we knew [Lincoln] walked like a laborer. And the warmth in his face when he would tell those stories. The one thing I teased Tony Kushner about endlessly is, 鈥淵ou鈥檝e got to get Lincoln鈥檚 stories in there.鈥� The stories were his means of communicating and, more importantly, whittling off sadness, so that his melancholy was dealt with. [Kushner] obviously got those stories in there to show that side of Lincoln. I鈥檓 often asked, 鈥淚f you could only spend one dinner with Lincoln, what would you ask him?鈥� And I know I鈥檓 supposed to say, as an historian, 鈥淲hat would you have done differently about Reconstruction?鈥� But I know I would simply say, 鈥淭ell me one story after another.鈥�

Q: What can you tell us about your next book?听

Hopefully, it will be out in the late fall of 2013.... It鈥檚 really about Theodore Roosevelt鈥檚 ability to use the bully pulpit and [William Howard] Taft鈥檚 corresponding difficulty with it, even though they were such great friends and shared much of the ideology together. Until they split apart.... Edmund Morris鈥檚 [Theodore Roosevelt] trilogy is so fine, there鈥檚 no way I was going to write a biography of Theodore Roosevelt.... I鈥檝e always been interested in the Progressive Era. Then when I read about [Roosevelt鈥檚] friendship with Taft and knowing it had broken apart when they ran against each other in 1912, that became an angle. So it could be a different look at the era.听

Erik Spanberg is a Monitor contributor.