海角大神

海角大神 / Text

鈥業 Am Nobody鈥檚 Slave鈥 charts a course toward intergenerational healing

In 鈥淚 Am Nobody鈥檚 Slave,鈥 memoirist Lee Hawkins reaches deep into his family history and finds redemption in understanding his roots.

By Ken Makin, Cultural commentator

Lee Hawkins鈥 devastating memoir, 鈥淚 Am Nobody鈥檚 Slave: How Uncovering My Family鈥檚 History Set Me Free,鈥 is about the ties that bind, both familial and societal. Hawkins, an editor and reporter for The Wall Street Journal, details the harsh realities of growing up in a middle-class Black family with deep, unacknowledged ancestral wounds. These moral, psychological, and physical injuries drove his parents to inflict frequent beatings on their three children in the twisted hope that keeping them in line, and out of trouble, would protect them from a racist society.

The book begins innocuously with personal anecdotes about the importance of the Black church and male mentorship in Hawkins鈥 life. The narrative shifts after Hawkins鈥 family moves, when he is a kindergartner, from a largely Black area of St. Paul, Minnesota, to the white suburb of Maplewood for better schools. It is an idea akin to that of the Great Migration, where Black folks moved to Northern states in hopes of escaping Jim Crow. The author鈥檚 predecessors left Alabama in search of better opportunities for employment and education. However, there was no hiding place for Hawkins 鈥 not from racism, nor from his hypervigilant parents. Their concerns about racial conflict and violence, as well as fears for their son鈥檚 safety, were justified, even if their behavior was not. The visceral racism directed at Hawkins included everything from vile epithets to targeted hate mail.

Hawkins acknowledges that white people were not the only perpetrators of violence, which he describes in his recollection of the iconic 鈥淩oots鈥 TV miniseries:

鈥淩ewatching the scene years later, I saw the white overseer of the enslaved people hand the whip to a Black man and command him to do the whipping. In his relentless pursuit to strip the proud Black boy of his confident sense of freedom in his Black identity, the white man never even had to touch Kunta Kinte. The enslaved Black man obeyed his order and did the white man鈥檚 dirty work for him.鈥

Hawkins notes the pushback on Black mobility and expression, both from within his family and outside it. There were efforts to discourage Hawkins鈥 outspokenness, which ultimately led to a budding interest in politics and a successful career as a writer.

What begins as a memoir evolves into a compelling American story fueled not only by research into race and sociology, but also by Hawkins鈥 genealogy. His family history shows how violence and rape in the era of chattel slavery can be felt over the generations, both for the family of the enslavers and for the enslaved.

At first, I was hesitant to appreciate Hawkins鈥 need to outline his childhood experiences in such painstaking detail. His intent becomes clear, however, as the story continues. The writer wanted readers to feel the same heartbreak he experienced. Ultimately, through self-reflection and the help of a therapist, he was finally able to construct his own figurative manumission papers.

Hawkins鈥 memoir, while wholly honest and emotional, is not entirely sad. There are threads of Black entertainment and interpretations of empowerment that work in this book like they do for so many Black folks here and abroad 鈥 as symbols of hope.

Hawkins speaks about his late father鈥檚 affiliation with Sounds of Blackness, a musical ensemble from Minnesota whose most recognizable song is 鈥淥ptimistic.鈥 It is a providential footnote, much like the mentions of 鈥淩oots.鈥 There is also an underlying appreciation for Black political consciousness and fluidity, a welcome contrast to the mass media depiction of a monolithic voting bloc. Much like Hawkins and his father, I also remember watching 鈥淭ony Brown鈥檚 Journal鈥 with my dad, and though Brown joined the Republican Party in 1990, he opened his show to guests of all political and social walks of life.

I smiled when Hawkins mentioned Stacey Patton as a point of reference in stopping violence against children. Dr. Patton鈥檚 鈥淪pare the Kids: Why Whupping Children Won鈥檛 Save Black America鈥 is an essential work advocating against corporal punishment, and her 2008 memoir, 鈥淭hat Mean Old Yesterday,鈥 reads similarly to Hawkins鈥 work. I would be remiss if I didn鈥檛 note the similarities in their families and upbringing 鈥 seemingly perfect from the outside, while violent behind the scenes. Nevertheless, both of them are doing the reclamation work necessary for not only themselves, but also generations of people disenfranchised by racism and caught in patterns of violence.

Hawkins鈥 willingness to discuss his 鈥渕ean old yesterday鈥 offers a new hope in the present. If we can acknowledge the trauma of slavery and the fact of its continuing repercussions 鈥 individually, within families, and in this country 鈥 we can begin the task of healing.

It is a liberation movement worth reading about and practicing.