海角大神

海角大神 / Text

鈥楴atural History鈥 is a beautiful, challenging puzzle

A collaboration between a curator and a fashion designer evolves into a mind-bending exploration of perception and truth in this enigmatic novel.

By Joan Gaylord , Correspondent

Costa Rican writer Carlos Fonseca鈥檚 latest book begins with a simple premise: The narrator, a curator in a natural history museum in New Jersey, receives a call from Giovanna Luxembourg, a prominent fashion designer, who proposes a collaborative project. They are both intrigued by natural patterns and colors that provide camouflage. Obscurity isn鈥檛 the usual m茅tier of a designer, but that anomaly only hints at the depth of subterfuge that unfolds in the pages of this wonderfully enigmatic novel.

The two do meet 鈥 many times, in fact, over the course of a few years. During their rambling conversations, Giovanna spills intriguing hints about her life and her family, mysterious stories devoid of identifying detail, tales that she never authenticates. 鈥淥ne of these days I鈥檒l show you the papers,鈥 she promises. But she never does. And no exhibition ever comes into focus for the pair before Giovanna succumbs to an unspecified illness.

It is only years later that the curator begins to untangle the facts. His pursuit, which Fonseca lays out in the next four sections of the book, unwinds into a tale that challenges commonly held perceptions about identity, obscurity, and interpretation 鈥 and that鈥檚 just to start.

The journey begins when the curator accepts delivery of a package that contains a stack of manila envelopes. Carefully tied with string, each envelope holds files 鈥 Giovanna鈥檚 archives for the proposed project. Each file is meticulously detailed and organized in a manner that defies the evasiveness she had always conveyed in their conversations.

The archive becomes the curator鈥檚 treasure map. With academic rigor, he embarks on an adventure to verify the mysterious wisps of the designer鈥檚 stories, and maybe discern what is real, too. He follows a trail that reaches across continents and decades, touching on political movements and popular culture. It introduces a colorful collection of characters, including a prominent fashion photographer, a conceptual artist put on trial for the repercussions of her work, and an apparent prophet hidden away in a South American jungle.聽

So does he learn the truth? Fonseca seems to argue that the answer would depend on one鈥檚 perspective. People don鈥檛 see from a singular point of view, after all, so how do we decide what is genuine, what is true? Fiction 鈥渢ruly begins with the one who holds the camera,鈥 he writes.

The narrator does learn facts about Giovanna鈥檚 family members and the lives they lived. But he begins to grasp that his understanding of these details is at the mercy of someone else鈥檚 telling, whether they鈥檙e shared in the words of a news story or conveyed in photographs. Does learning about past events in this way really provide him with a clearer picture of Giovanna, or is he merely accepting someone else鈥檚 fiction?

鈥淣atural History鈥 delivers a conundrum of a story, one that depends upon neither events nor characters for its substance. Reading each page requires unwinding a riddle of themes to discover hints and clues hidden in familiar history. Fonseca presses the reader to grapple with such issues as authenticity and subterfuge, challenging the idea that anyone can truly know about the world and its inhabitants. It鈥檚 helpful to remember that the story begins with a shared appreciation of naturally occurring camouflage.

With lush prose that owes a debt to translator Megan McDowell, Fonseca weaves the fictional threads of Giovanna鈥檚 life into a fabric of real history, grounding his story in events ranging from Sherman鈥檚 March to the Sea to the legal battle between sculptor Constantin Br芒ncu葯i聽and the American government that redefined 鈥渁rt鈥 at the turn of the 20th century. Even Andy Warhol gets a mention.聽

Yet no matter how seemingly obscure a reference may appear to be, no detail in this book is superfluous. Fonseca ties each one into recurring motifs that illustrate his interpretation of perception and reality, faith and irony, tragedy and farce. Though sometimes inscrutable, he presses the reader to consider the ways that societies communicate 鈥 and how, in turn, perspectives shape perceptions in the arts and in politics.