Malcolm Gladwell鈥檚 鈥楾alking to Strangers鈥� is a swing and a miss
The bestselling author says that we need more trust. But the monstrous crimes in his case studies don't help his argument.
The bestselling author says that we need more trust. But the monstrous crimes in his case studies don't help his argument.
The death of Sandra Bland, an African American woman who was arrested during a 2015 traffic stop in Texas and who died by suicide in her jail cell three days later, led to protests, investigations, and copious analysis. But Malcolm Gladwell thinks our conversations about it have missed the point.聽
His latest book, 鈥淭alking to Strangers: What We Should Know about the People We Don鈥檛 Know,鈥� was inspired by his dismay over Bland鈥檚 death and is framed by a close reading of the heated encounter between Bland and Brian Encinia, the police officer who pulled her over for failure to signal a lane change. While most commentators view the Bland case through the prism of racism or bad policing, Gladwell sees it as symptomatic of our inability, as a society, to make sense of strangers.
As in Gladwell鈥檚 previous books, most recently 2013鈥檚 鈥淒avid and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants,鈥� the best-selling author and New Yorker writer puts a distinctive and provocative spin on his topic, bringing it to life by populating the book with riveting, headline-grabbing scandals (Amanda Knox, Jerry Sandusky, and Bernie Madoff are among his extended case studies) and drawing on psychological research and social science to support his claims. The book is consistently intriguing and compelling, if at times a bit scattershot.
In all of his chosen examples, Gladwell writes, after being confronted by strangers, 鈥渢he parties involved relied on a set of strategies to translate one another鈥檚 words and intentions. And in each case, something went very wrong.鈥� Two of the primary strategies he covers are known as default to truth and transparency. Drawing on the experiments of Timothy Levine, who studies deception, Gladwell explains that people are generally wired with a default to truth. 鈥淸O]ur operating assumption,鈥� he writes, 鈥渋s that the people we are dealing with are honest.鈥� Being wired this way has evolutionary advantages: society could hardly function if we assumed everyone we met was out to cheat or harm us.聽
But, Gladwell notes, 鈥淒efault to truth becomes an issue when we are forced to choose between two alternatives, one of which is likely and the other of which is impossible to imagine. ... Default to truth biases us in favor of the most likely interpretation.鈥� Thus, Bernie Madoff was able to run his Ponzi scheme for years despite the fact that his investment operation raised red flags; Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky wasn鈥檛 arrested until 2011 despite the fact that a witness had reported seeing him abuse a boy a decade earlier. It was easier to believe that Madoff was some kind of financial wizard than that he was running the biggest financial fraud in U.S. history, easier to believe that the witness was mistaken than that the beloved coach was a serial pedophile.
Relatedly, transparency is the idea that 鈥渢he way a stranger looks and acts is a reliable clue to the way they feel.鈥� Here Gladwell examines the case of Amanda Knox, the American exchange student who was convicted of the 2007 murder of her roommate and spent four years in an Italian prison before being exonerated. Gladwell calls Knox 鈥渢he innocent person who acts guilty.鈥� It was not forensic evidence but Knox鈥檚 demeanor 鈥� reacting inappropriately, appearing indifferent to her roommate鈥檚 death 鈥� that led to her wrongful conviction.聽
Toward the end of "Talking to Strangers," Gladwell brings his analysis back to Sandra Bland by describing how the theories he鈥檚 covered impact law enforcement. These days, police officers are trained to suspect everyone, to suppress their natural tendency to default to truth. They engage in what Gladwell terms 鈥渉aystack searches鈥� 鈥� using a minor infraction as a justification to look for something more substantial, like drugs or weapons. In extremely high-crime areas, Gladwell reasons, residents might be more accepting of 鈥渢he inevitable trade-off between fighting crime and harassing innocent people.鈥� But as a blanket approach 鈥� for instance, tailing a driver in a low-crime area and then pulling her over for failure to signal when she changes lanes to let the police officer pass 鈥� it doesn鈥檛 make sense.
Gladwell ends the book with a plug for default to truth: 鈥淭o assume the best about another is the trait that has created modern society,鈥� he writes. 鈥淭hose occasions when our trusting nature gets violated are tragic. But the alternative 鈥� to abandon trust as a defense against predation and deception 鈥� is worse.鈥� That either/or conclusion doesn鈥檛 feel satisfactory given the damage the author has detailed in previous chapters; default to truth certainly failed Madoff鈥檚 investors and Sandusky鈥檚 victims. It鈥檚 surprising, too, that Gladwell doesn鈥檛 address fraud and deception on the Internet, today鈥檚 primary meeting place for strangers. Does the virtual world require its own set of tools? Gladwell is better at telling us what鈥檚 wrong with our current strategies to deal with strangers than at offering up newer, more relevant ones. His suggestion that we attend to people we don鈥檛 know with 鈥渞estraint and humility鈥� hardly seems up to the task of solving the conundrums he鈥檚 presented.