海角大神

Sexting: They don't call it that now, and other facts about teen mobile nudity

Sexting is pass茅, at least using that word to describe sending nude photos between smart phones is, researchers say. We now know more than ever before about what sexting is and why teens and adults do it. Here's a rundown. 

Despite what we see in news headlines, there is no single term that people who share nude photos use, according to Australian researcher and author Nina Funnell*, who has interviewed some four dozen 16- to 25-year-olds about it. Especially not 鈥渟exting,鈥� she said in a talk I got to hear in Sydney this spring (their fall). Using the term tends to alienate young people, she said. And there are many more聽motivations聽for 鈥渟exting,鈥� as adults have come to call it, than there are terms for it. More on that in a moment 鈥� first a bit of background鈥�.

Until 2011, when Janis Wolak and David Finkelhor at the University of New Hampshire published the first聽, it was seen and treated as a single undifferentiated and mainly illegal practice. Wolak and Finkelhor significantly advanced understanding of the practice when they created two categories of 鈥測outh鈥恜roduced sexual images鈥� 鈥� 鈥淎ggravated鈥� and 鈥淓xperimental鈥� 鈥� based on their review of 鈥�550 cases obtained from a national survey of law enforcement agencies鈥� (for more, see聽). The cases all involved 鈥渋mages of minors created by minors that could qualify as child pornography under applicable criminal statutes.鈥�

This was a major step forward because 1) it opened up thought to the idea that sexting isn鈥檛 just deviant or criminal behavior and 2) it opened up 鈥渆xperimental鈥� or consensual sexting as an important new area of study. Still, it鈥檚 helpful to note that Wolak and Finkelhor鈥檚 study was of sexting cases that involved聽law enforcement,聽which both makes it all the more significant that the 鈥渆xperimental鈥� category emerged and makes it all the more important to understand that category better (and possibly rename it) by studying it outside the context of criminal law.

Out of the crime context

I鈥檇 say the next step in our collective understanding of sexting was psychology professor Elizabeth Englander鈥檚 finding that much of the harmful kind of sexting is coercive, and 鈥渁ny discussion of coercive sexting should be made in the context of sexual harassment,鈥� she reported in a study she published last year (see聽) 鈥� so we need to educate young people about what sexual harassment is in the digital age so they can protect themselves better not just from prosecution or a betrayal of trust but also from sexual harassment and manipulation.

But it鈥檚 equally important for parents and educators to understand that not all sexting is harmful 鈥� or even experimental. More and more, it鈥檚 also just the latest way people of all ages use imagery in consensual sexual activity. So we need to understand sexting better in the context of sexual health and adolescent development, including healthy risk-taking (see聽).

Sexual health & healthy risk-taking

So now the vital next phase: Nina is one of the researchers doing the important work of filling in the picture on the 鈥渆xperimental鈥� side (though she found the word to be problematic) through interviews with people who engage in it. She鈥檚 talking with teens and adults mostly ages 16-25, but some older (鈥渋nto their 60s鈥�), she said, 鈥渂oth male and female, and a mix of heterosexual, bisexual and same-sex-attracted.鈥� This qualitative research will go into a book she鈥檚 working on.

What she has found is that sexting involves a broad spectrum of motivations. 鈥淏ased on my interviews with young people, I鈥檝e found that the range of motives around sexting is as complex and multifaceted as you would expect to find in relation to any other sexual activity,鈥� Nina wrote me in an email after her talk, and not all the motivations are sexual, she added.

The motivation spectrum

Among the motivations she鈥檚 heard from interviewees are: 鈥減ushing boundaries鈥� (in games like 鈥淭ruth or Dare鈥� [see Related links below]); 鈥済roup identity bonding (sharing images in a group as a 鈥榯rust game鈥� in order to develop a sense of group solidarity)鈥�; 鈥渢esting out one鈥檚 desirability or sexual power with either a stranger or a prospective partner鈥�; flirting, foreplay (turned up by Pew Internet in 2009 鈥� see聽), or a purely digital sexual activity in its own right [in person or online]; a way for partners in a long-distance relationship to stay connected; safety for LGBT partners who haven鈥檛 yet come out; and safety for cultural or religious reasons (when physical contact is not allowed before marriage).

鈥淲e shouldn鈥檛 ever make assumptions about why a young person might engage in a particular behavior, because their reasons are highly diverse and individual,鈥� Nina wrote. They can also be highly localized.

Why better understanding helps

鈥淚n a particular school, you might get one particular group of 8-10 boys who all share nude images of girls without consent as a way of 鈥榖onding鈥� [what Wolak and Finkelhor would probably call "aggravated sexting"] and, while that is accepted within their micro group, meanwhile the rest of the students [in their class] are dead opposed to it.鈥� [She's talking about the overall protective social norms of the larger community (which deserve acknowledgment and support from adults) around an anti-social group dynamic).]

鈥淭hat sort of thing to me demonstrates how values and 鈥榰nwritten rules鈥� are negotiated at a very, very localized level,鈥� Nina added, pointing to the challenge of educators: that 鈥渢op-down approaches would be unlikely to generate much behavioral change for those 8-10 individuals.鈥� By 鈥渢op-down approaches,鈥� she鈥檚 referring to general anti-sexting campaigns and directives from authorities. 鈥淭he spectrum of motivations must be better understood before we can develop meaningful educational resources,鈥� she wrote.

The vast majority of teens already have plenty of positive social norms in place 鈥� norms they鈥檝e been exposed to all their lives, starting in their families and practiced at school, online, wherever they interact. The adults in their lives will be much better-equipped to guide them if we understand that practices such as sexting aren鈥檛 single undifferentiated new 鈥渢hreats鈥� but rather spectrums of tech-related behaviors just as affected by social norms as social experiences that have nothing to do with technology. And we鈥檒l also be much better able to guide them 鈥� and to enlist their help when problems arise 鈥� if we acknowledge and support the intelligent norms and values they are already practicing.

*A little more on the researcher I feature in this post: Nina Funnell was awarded the Australian Human Rights Commission award in 2010 and was a finalist for Young Australian of The Year for her work in sexual violence prevention. She contributed to the book Big Porn Inc: Exposing the Harms of the Global Pornography Industry and is currently working on a book about sexting.

海角大神 has assembled a diverse group of the best family and parenting bloggers out there. Our contributing and guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor, and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. Anne Collier blogs at聽.