海角大神

Why US athletes no longer have to pay a 'victory tax' for Olympic medals

Congress passed a bill Thursday that would exempt Olympic athletes from paying taxes for their medals and cash prizes, eliminating the so-called "victory tax."

US Olympic winners usually come home with a shiny medal and cash prizes, but they also find a hefty tax bill awaiting their return.

But the Olympic "victory tax" may soon be eliminated.

Congress passed a bill on Thursday that would exempt American athletes from paying taxes on their Olympic prizes.

鈥淥ur Olympian and Paralympic athletes should be worried about breaking world records 鈥� 鈥� when they earn a medal," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D) of New York said in a statement. "After a successful and hard-fought victory, it's just not right for the U.S. to welcome these athletes home with a tax on that victory."

American Olympic medal winners are also聽: $25,000 for gold, $15,000 for silver, and $10,000 for bronze. The medals themselves also have cash value, with gold fetching around $600, silver $300, while bronze has little intrinsic value, according to the Associated Press. Olympic prizes are taxed, just as lottery or game show winnings are taxed, because the money is deemed by the IRS as an earned income.

Currently, the tax rates聽聽for athletes. As reported by Marketplace in August, the amount is based on tax rates for income earned abroad. Gold medalists can be taxed up to $9,900 per medal, silver medalists $5,940 per medal, and bronze medalists $3,960 per medal. On top of that, they can be taxed on the value of the medal itself. Taxes for a gold medal is $564 and silver $305.

The tax exemption bill Congress passed is seen as a way to help US athletes keep more of their Olympic earnings, especially in sports where many have documented their just to get to the international stage, as The Guardian reports. American athletes are also awarded less than some and receive relatively , the Washington Post notes.聽President Barack Obama for the idea when it was brought up in 2012.

That means Obama is likely to sign the bill into law. But it won't help all athletes, just those whose biggest windfall tends to come from winning in games.

For a few top athletes, their biggest source of income is from with companies. For example, Michael Phelps received a $1 million bonus from Speedo after winning eight gold medals in Beijing in 2008; And Team USA basketball star Kevin Durant has endorsements of $36 million for the year ending June 2016, according to Money.

The bill passed Congress still聽who earn more than $1 million a year, which would include athletes such as Phelps.聽

Athletes in less high-profile sports generally聽. As reported in CNN in July, Olympic fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad gets by with a small stipend from the US Olympics Committee (USOC,) endorsements from Visa and Dick鈥檚 Sporting Goods, and she started her own fashion line.

But even with that support, she launched a crowdfunding campaign to bring her family to Rio.聽

For other athletes, the money cobbled together through small sponsorships is not enough to support their lives outside of basic living and training expenses. As The Washington Post reported in July, more than to ask for donations for new gear, living expenses or for sending family members to Rio to watch them compete. Dick鈥檚 Sporting Goods launched a program to to work in their stores.

In the US, the US Olympic Committee (USOC) is responsible for training, entering, and funding US teams going to the Olympics, Paralympics, and other international competitions. Unlike in other countries, the USOC is and relies on donations and sponsors. The USOC had 558 athletes in the 2016 Rio Olympics.

"I wish we could support everybody," USOC CEO Scott Blackmun told USA TODAY in a 2013 interview. "But the truth is, our job is to put as many Americans that we can on the podium so we try to prioritize our support. 鈥� With our limited resources, there's no way we could support every athlete who aspires to be an Olympian."

But some see the USOC as part of the problem, and say the tax exemption is little more than a band-aid.聽

鈥淚f Congress wants to provide financial assistance to truly struggling athletes, it should just man up and establish some sort of fund aimed at helping those who need it most,鈥� Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, argued in August in a blog republished by 海角大神. 聽鈥淒espite what Congress wants you to believe, this bill would聽do almost nothing聽to help them.鈥�

Gleckman saw the act as 鈥渁 way for politicians to use the tax code to make it appear they are supporting deserving Olympians when they really are not.鈥�

According to a Washington Post investigation earlier this year, an USOC official concede that most US Olympic athletesfrom their sports to make a living. But the article also points out that while the athletes receive low stipends, the USOC executives walk away with first-class perks and lucrative paychecks. For example, USA Swimming Executive Director Chuck Wielgus makes $854,000 and the national swim team director earns $346,000 while their swimmers competing in Rio have monthly stipends capped at $42,000 per year.

鈥淭here are limited resources for sure. You don鈥檛 want to take so much money away from the USOC .鈥�.鈥�. that they can鈥檛 do their jobs,鈥� Eli Bremer, a former Olympic modern pentathlete who competed in the 2008 Summer Games, told the Washington Post. 鈥淏ut you don鈥檛 want them getting fat and happy while the athletes live in poverty. I believe there is a better balance.鈥�

Some who study the industry want to see bigger reforms that address the gap in pay and provide more support to athletes. Andrew Zimbalist, a professor of economics at Smith College, says that the proposed tax exemptions don't address the problem adequately.

鈥淚t is not equitable for these executives to get these high salaries and for these athletes to get next to nothing,鈥� Prof. Zimbalist tells 海角大神 in a phone interview. 鈥淚 think the system needs more serious reform than just not taxing $25,000 and a medal.鈥�