海角大神

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earned immediate criticism Wednesday for remarks he made at the World Zionist Congress, telling Jewish leaders that a Palestinian leader who died in 1974 was responsible for the Holocaust.

"Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews [in 1941], he wanted to expel the Jews," Mr. Netanyahu said on Tuesday, . "And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, 'If you expel them, they'll all come here.' 'So what should I do with them?' he asked. He said, 'Burn them.'"

Although al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem at the time, was , and fought unsuccessfully throughout his life to prevent a Jewish homeland in the Middle East, historians strongly rebutted Netanyahu's claim, saying evidence of the Third Reich's genocidal intent was in place well before Hitler met with al-Husseini.听

Tel Aviv University professor听Meir Litvak, for instance, told Israel's Ynetnews that plans for the Holocaust were put in place by 1939. Al-Husseini "was an abominable person," Dr. Litvak said, ""

"We know that responsibility for this crime against humanity is German and very much our own," a spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel told Ynet's Ahiya Raved.听

It's not the first time Netanyahu has come under attack for using questionable Holocaust references. In 2012, between the threats posed by Iran's nuclear program and Nazi Germany's concentration camps. 听

When the Israeli Knesset was in non-historical or educational contexts, hoping to cut down on "trivializing" political and popular usages alike, a column by former CIA analyst Paul Pillar wryly noted that the Prime Minister himself 听

But throwing out inaccurate, if sincerely felt, comparisons between contemporary political dilemmas and the murder of more than 10 million people, or the conditions leading up to it, is a global phenomenon.听

As the Anti-Defamation League has documented, Arab publications frequently .听

In the United States, many politicians, including Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson, also rely on the Holocaust for rhetorical purposes.

"Like many other political autodidacts, " Peter Wehner, a former adviser to President Reagan and both President Bushes, wrote in a New York Times op-ed:

On several occasions, the pediatric-neurosurgeon-turned-Republican-presidential-candidate has compared the United States to the Third Reich. Mr. Carson has warned that a Hitler-like figure could rise in America. To understand what is happening in the Obama era, he recommended that people read 鈥淢ein Kampf.鈥� And he won鈥檛 let go of the myth that the Holocaust would have been 鈥済reatly diminished鈥� if Jews in Nazi Germany had been allowed to possess guns.

Apart from criticizing such claims for their "staggering ignorance," Mr. Wehner also objected on political grounds. To see Republican candidates repeatedly voicing ahistorical arguments is "intellectually discrediting, politically self-defeating and unworthy of those who are citizens of a great republic," he rebuked.

In an interview with Hopes & Fears, Michael Berenbaum, a Holocaust expert and the first director of the听United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, says Dr. Carson's "statements on the Nazis and guns ," pointing out that fully equipped armies couldn't stop Hitler's land grab.听

So why do such comparisons persist?

"We have established the Holocaust as ," Mr. Berenbaum told David Grossman.

We don鈥檛 know what鈥檚 good, we don鈥檛 know what鈥檚 bad, but we do know that the Holocaust was the Olympics of Evil. When people want to speak about something terrible and want to call attention to it, almost by lack of imagination they make Nazi analogies, whether or not it makes sense.