Bangkok Post (Thailand)
Op-Ed, former US assistant secretary of state for East Asia Christopher Hill
Many compare the situation in Syria to that of the Balkans war in the 1990s, but there are key differences, including the diplomatic process preceding intervention. During the Balkans war, representatives from Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and the US created a 鈥淐ontact Group鈥� after months of diplomacy to inform their plan and how it was carried out. But in Syria, only former United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan and select observers have played a role in the diplomatic process on-the-ground.
鈥淲hat is really needed are serious and sustained negotiations among interested international powers ... on a viable political outcome.鈥� The plan should be worked out with Mr. Annan, and should be abided to both publicly and privately. 鈥淐learly, a new way forward is needed, and a good start would be a political/diplomatic plan that Mr. Annan could sell to the [involved] parties.鈥� But success in the Balkans was largely due to the support every country gave to the Contact Group plan: 鈥淭he same unqualified support is what Mr. Annan 鈥� the best diplomat we have out there 鈥� needs and deserves.鈥�
