US, Philippines boost military ties. Why now?
| Manila, Philippines
The US and the Philippines signed a 10-year defense agreement聽Monday聽with the potential to significantly increase US military forces in the country.
After two years of talks, US and Philippine negotiators came to terms on an arrangement that supports President Obama's "pivot" of US military strength in Asia at a time when China鈥檚 expanding military presence has raised tension throughout the region.
The United States 鈥� which long maintained major bases in the Southeast Asian nation 鈥� has been barred for more than two decades from any permanent military presence in the country. Under the new agreement the US military will be able to send ships and planes to Clark Air Base and the Subic Bay Naval Base, former US bases now owned by the Philippines, for both commercial and military use.
Mr. Obama, on his first visit to the Philippines, called the agreement an 鈥渋mportant new chapter鈥� in the two countries' relationship and sought to counter criticism that it might add tension in the South China Sea, which China claims in its entirety. The pact's purpose, he said, is to promote peace and stability.
鈥淥ur goal is not to contain China," he said in a joint news conference here with the Philippines' President Benigno Aquino. 鈥淥ur goal is to make sure international rules and norms are respected and that includes in the area of international disputes.鈥�
The agreement marks a milestone in the history of US-Philippine military relations, beginning with the Spanish-American War of 1898 that resulted in the Philippines becoming a US colony. The US developed enormous bases before the Japanese took them over in World War II, and returned to them after the defeat of the Japanese and the independence of the Philippines in 1946. The US gave up the bases in 1991, after the Philippines Senate refused to extend the lease.聽
How many US troops will be in the Philippines at any time is uncertain, but the agreement leaves open the possibility of thousands in case of a crisis.聽Although the pact does not authorize a聽permanent presence,聽US forces will rotate in and out聽of existing Philippine bases on聽missions ranging from training of the Philippines' weak armed forces to humanitarian rescues聽to advising on combating both communist and Islamic revolt. The agreement also sends a message to China not to assert its control over the South China Sea.
But questions are rising about the deal's constitutionality since the Philippines Constitution, adopted in 1987 a year after the the dictatorial regime of Ferdinand Marcos was overthrown, specifically bans foreign bases or forces on Philippine soil. In the past, that ban has been circumvented by limiting US forces to a "visiting forces agreement."
Both Obama and Mr. Aquino were careful not to attribute the agreement directly to concerns about China鈥檚 territorial claims. They also did not mention the Philippines鈥� claims to the Paracel islands, some of which are held by China, or China鈥檚 takeover of the Scarborough shoal west of Subic Bay, a rich fishing ground that the Philippine says is within its territorial limits.
Shifting national mood聽
Some Filipino political figures, commentators, and demonstrators took issue with the agreement, viewing it as a step toward bringing back thousands of US troops.聽Filipino 鈥榥ationalist鈥� groups rose in mass protest against US bases after the People Power revolution drove Ferdinand Marcos from the presidency in early 1986, leading to Corazon Aquino鈥檚 election as president and finally to adoption in 1987 of the 鈥渁nti-base鈥� Constitution.
An influential senator, Miriam Defensor Santiago, predicted that the agreement would 鈥渇urther antagonize China鈥� by placing the Philippines in 鈥渢he American column instead of the China column.鈥澛�
Yet many observers believe that the popular mood has shifted substantially. 鈥淧eople ... don鈥檛 mind [a US troop presence],鈥� says Carlos Conde, a veteran journalist now with Amnesty International in Manila. Famous Filipino political figures who once campaigned vigorously against the bases are now retired or inactive.
Activists 鈥渘o longer block US interest in the Senate and elsewhere,鈥� he says. Although 鈥渢he usual leftist鈥� are 鈥渟till doing it,鈥� he adds, 鈥渋f anything, they鈥檙e criticized for creating traffic jams every time they hit the streets.鈥�
Small protests聽
About 2,000 protesters were doing just that聽on Monday, challenging rows of policemen at the Mendiola Bridge three blocks from Malacanang Palace where Obama and Aquino were meeting and then holding forth at a press conference. Banners and placards read: 聽鈥淥bama Out鈥� and 鈥淧hilippines Not for Sale.鈥� Elsewhere, an image of Obama was burnt in effigy.
The protesters, relatively small in numbers, have the support of intellectual figures often critical of the government.
The Philippine Inquirer, a leading newspaper, editorialized, 鈥淲e have long advocated that any enhancement in defense cooperation between the聽Philippines and the聽United States聽must have the consent of the senate鈥�. Malacanang鈥檚 failure to submit the agreement to a largely friendly Senate is inexplicable.鈥�
Others, however, disagree. The agreement 鈥渆nhances security for the region,鈥� says Jerome Gonzalez, head of research for PhilEquity, an investment firm. Investors would rather not pay attention to territorial disputes with China, preferring to be able to 鈥渄ismiss tensions.鈥�
