For younger South Koreans, the Korean War is just ancient history
Loading...
| Seoul, South Korea
Six decades after the signing of the cease-fire agreement that effectively ended the Korean War, the South Korean government is concerned that young people are increasingly uninterested in a war that continues to influence East Asian politics and security.听
On July 27, 1953, three years after North Korea launched its invasion of the South, an armistice agreement intended to end hostilities on the divided peninsula went into effect. A permanent peace treaty has never been signed, a fact that underlies current tensions such as Pyongyang鈥檚 threats to launch nuclear strikes earlier this year. But despite the ongoing, and at times intense, rivalry between North Korea and South Korea, many South Koreans have grown apathetic toward the war鈥檚 impact, say observers.
鈥淭he legacy of the war is being forgotten,鈥 says Andrew Salmon, author of two books on the Korean War.听The Seoul-based writer says that in this very 鈥渇uture focused鈥 country, there鈥檚 no time to dwell on the past. The conflict seems 鈥渓ike a war that took place in another country.鈥
American history textbooks have also been accused of overlooking the Korean War, often called the 鈥滷orgotten War,鈥 a conflict in which 33,000 US soldiers died while fighting North Korean and Chinese forces.听
Over the past five years, surveys reveal that many South Korean students and young adults get the facts wrong about the origins of the Korean War, which killed an estimated 1 million people on both sides of the border and separated tens of thousands of Korean families. Recent government and privately conducted polls show that respondents have trouble remembering when the war broke out, which nations were involved, as well as which country actually started the conflict.听聽
'Serious problem'
South Korean President Park Geun-hye recently called this apparent lack of understanding a 鈥渟erious problem鈥 for her nation, and ordered the Ministry of Education to strengthen its school curriculum on this period of modern history. 鈥淭his shows that something is wrong with our education system,鈥 Park was quoted saying by domestic press.听
During the decades following the Korean War, South Koreans were taught that the North was enemy No. 1. Military leaders in Seoul often used the fear of a communist takeover to their political advantage. But starting in the late 1990s, there was a shift in how students were taught about their northern neighbor, says Jasper Kim of the Asia Pacific Global Research Group. That鈥檚 when former president Kim Dae-jung began the pro-engagement strategy known as the Sunshine Policy.
鈥淭hey had to create a legacy that was different than their predecessors,鈥 Mr. Kim, the analyst, says of the Kim Dae-Jung and Roh Moo-hyun administrations. 鈥淭hey [their predecessors] were mostly from the military and more apt to support the US.鈥 In order for these liberal politicians to win the presidency, they had to 'go against the grain' and win over voters with a different platform toward North Korea.鈥澛犅
Teachers placed less emphasis on the war and more on the peninsula鈥檚 division during that time. Kim says this interpretation of the war鈥檚 facts has caused 鈥渟tark differences鈥 between South Korean generations as well as some resentment toward the United States.听
Conflicted by conspiracy theory
Some South Koreans who grew up during the now-defunct Sunshine Policy say they still feel conflicted over how to view the Korean War.听聽
Lee Han-byul, a 20-year-old university student, says that when she studied history in grade school, her friends believed in many of the conspiracy theories about the Korean War, such as that foreign powers were behind the whole thing.
鈥淓ven though we learned that North Korea started the war, I feel that it鈥檚 still up for debate, and if that鈥檚 what really happened, it seemed controversial,鈥 she says. Ms. Lee adds the anniversary of the cease-fire agreement signing is 鈥渏ust a normal day鈥 to her.
鈥淲hen I was in middle school, all we learned was that we needed to unify with the North, but we never really learned why,鈥 says another university student, 22-year-old Lee Ji-young. 鈥淏ut now, I think after North Korea鈥檚 attacks, people don鈥檛 really feel that way anymore.鈥
Lee Ji-young is referring to when North Korea bombed an inhabited South Korean island and was blamed for sinking a South Korean naval ship in 2010.听Those incidents, as well as the almost daily provocations by Pyongyang during this past March and April, made Koreans such as herself question why they should help the North, she says.
North Korea鈥檚 bellicose antics might have helped South Korea鈥檚 ideological pendulum start swinging back the other way. Kim, the analyst, says the conservative President Park benefited from the youth vote during last year鈥檚 election. That鈥檚 in part because of this age group鈥檚 growing dissatisfaction toward the North. But Jasper Kim doesn鈥檛 think recalibrating school textbooks toward the right will make any difference on how students regard the Korean War.
鈥淭he young generation lives in a different Korea than their parents or especially their grandparents,鈥 he says. 鈥淚n the old days, people were all about the country, country over individualism. Now, they鈥檙e more interested in practical things, like finding a job.鈥
Author Mr. Salmon says its not surprising the war seems less relevant to young South Koreans these days. It鈥檚 a subtle dying off that all countries experience.听鈥淓very war becomes forgotten two or three generations down the line,鈥 he says. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e only kept alive by historians.鈥