Why Rousseff's exit may not usher in the change Brazilians want
Loading...
| S茫o Paulo, Brazil; and Mexico City
When Dilma Rousseff was first elected president in 2010, it was against the backdrop of a country on the rise.
Six years later, millions of citizens are hoping that Ms. Roussseff鈥檚 removal from office today will be the first step in getting Brazil鈥檚 lagging economy and divided politics back on track.
The first female president and a former leftist guerrilla tortured under Brazil鈥檚 dictatorship, Rousseff has played an important role in solidifying parts of the legacy of her Worker鈥檚 Party (PT). She expanded some of the social policies of her predecessor, former President Luiz In谩cio Lula da Silva, and added her own initiatives in an effort to draw millions of Brazilians out of poverty. She emphasized human rights, overseeing the nation鈥檚 2012 truth commission, and spoke frequently about the importance of combating corruption.
That, however, may not be how history remembers her 鈥撀燼 result, in part, of how divisive the impeachment proceedings have been for Brazil.
鈥淚鈥檓 afraid she will be remembered mainly as the first Brazilian president to be impeached from office,鈥 says Marieke Riethof, lecturer in Latin American politics at the University of Liverpool.聽
The senate voted 61 to 20 to remover her from office today, after grilling the suspended president for 14 hours Monday on her management of the nation鈥檚 budget. That was followed Tuesday by a full day of tearful pleas and unbridled insults from lawyers as well as testimony by nearly all of the country鈥檚 81 senators.
But while the impeachment may forever be Rousseff鈥檚 tagline, it is unlikely to deliver the deep changes that could remedy the nation鈥檚 crises, analysts say.
The government is going to change, but the political system likely won鈥檛, says Matthew Taylor, an associate professor at American University鈥檚 School of International Service in Washington, who studies corruption in Brazil.聽
For nearly a decade, 鈥淏razil had the luxury of growing, expanding the social pie without many hard choices. But [the] limits of that expansion are becoming ever clearer,鈥 Mr. Taylor says.
鈥淏razilians know they need to undertake some kind of reform, but it鈥檚 the classic 鈥榥ot in my back yard鈥 scenario. They鈥檙e willing to see others [like Rousseff] pay the price, but they are not willing鈥 to make hard choices themselves, like reforming the vast multiparty political system or capping federal spending.
What about democracy?
Despite the relative silence in the streets since Rousseff was suspended from office last spring, protesters turned out anew this week to voice their concerns about their country's democracy.
鈥淭hey鈥檙e taking [out] a democratically-elected president and are trying to silence the people,鈥 says Raimundo Bonfim, head of the Popular Movements' Central, a social organizing network, who was at an anti-impeachment protest in S茫o Paolo Tuesday.
But even those mobilizing against impeachment said they felt the battle was already lost. 鈥淭here鈥檚 no way to put Dilma back in office now, the coup has been finalized,鈥 says Jussara Oliveira, a teacher, referring to the impeachment in the same language as Rousseff, who called the proceedings against her a 鈥渃onstitutional coup.鈥
鈥淏y Dilma鈥檚 account [her impeachment] is a terrible precedent for democracy. By the opposition鈥檚 account, it鈥檚 a blessing. I think the truth lies somewhere in between,鈥 says Taylor. 鈥淭he institutions are working the way they were designed [to work], but the politicization of the process is a concern for Brazilian democracy.鈥澛
Rousseff is accused of manipulating the national budget by delaying repayments on state loans. While illegal, it's a practice that politicians at all levels of government in Brazil employ. And many say the allegations against her are a blip compared to the corruption charges that more than 300 current and former politicians face in the colossal 鈥淐ar Wash鈥 kickback scheme between construction companies, the state oil company, and politicians.聽
鈥淣o one accused Dilma of enriching [herself] at the government鈥檚 expense, but of injuring the Constitution, disrespecting fiscal responsibility,鈥 says businessman Renato Teixeira, standing on the bustling Avenida Paulista.
Removing Rousseff from office definitively this week will allow the country to return to growth, Mr. Teixeira says. "I do not agree with this whole process. There was a lot of arbitrariness and wrongdoing during this impeachment, but she was not a good president and it will be better for the country."
How personal factors made her vulnerable
Brazil鈥檚 deeply divided views on Rousseff鈥檚 impeachment reflect dissatisfaction with politics as a whole, analysts say.
鈥淚f you look at her approval ratings compared to [interim President Michel] Temer, they are more or less the same,鈥 says Ms. Riethof. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 an indication that people are on one hand unhappy with her as a politician, but also dissatisfied with the quality of government in Brazil as a whole.鈥
The protests and polarization that have swept the country since 2012 reflect not only a frustration with an economic downturn that has left citizens struggling to make ends meet, but 鈥渁n electoral system that makes it very hard for voters to be heard,鈥 Taylor says.
Since Rousseff kicked off her second term in office in 2014, Brazil has faced deteriorating international demand for the commodities that fed its growth over the previous decade. The economy tanked, and the costs of Workers Party hallmarks like social programming, expanding credit for the poor, and lowering labor taxes in certain sectors became untenable. And the pile-up of corruption scandals implicating nearly every political party across the spectrum has created a backdrop of mistrust, even if Rousseff has not been directly implicated.聽
But personal factors also fed into her vulnerability.
鈥淒ilma has many qualities 鈥 and we saw a lot of them in her speech [Monday] 鈥 but the big defect she has is that she is not a politician,鈥 says Taylor. Her first time running for elected office was during her 2010 presidential bid, although she鈥檇 served in former President da Silva鈥檚 administration as energy minister and chief of staff.
鈥淪he has been abysmal at coalition relations in a context where 鈥 she needed to be out there making concessions to keep it together,鈥 Taylor says. 鈥淧art of it is personality. One of her best attributes may also be one of her worst: her tenacity, and on the flip side, stubbornness.鈥
For dentist Rogerio Bittencourt, out demonstrating in favor of Rousseff鈥檚 impeachment this week, her removal should spur larger-scale changes and send a message to politicians that they will be held accountable.
"Brazil needs an efficient mechanism of recall, as does any decent democracy.鈥