Libya's mercenaries pose difficult issue to resolve
As anti-Qaddafi forces in Libya take control of different parts of the country, I think it is more accurate to call the events there a civil war, rather than simply 鈥減rotests.鈥� One contentious issue in this civil war is Qaddafi鈥檚 use of mercenaries from elsewhere in Africa. As the situation in Libya rapidly evolves, determining who the mercenaries are 鈥� and who is not a mercenary 鈥� has challenged both observers and the anti-Qaddafi forces. It seems clear that there are foreign mercenaries fighting in Libya, but it also appears that some innocent sub-Saharan African migrants have found themselves in danger over false charges. This post gives some background on the situation.
Historically, as advisers and soldiers. , and it is likely Qaddafi is now using some of these hired guns against his own people.
Foreign mercenaries are likely to be less squeamish about shooting at local people.
鈥淭hey are likely to better trained 鈥� a small unit that can be relied upon. They might also have experience of fighting battles and therefore be more capable if push comes to shove,鈥� [said author Adam Roberts].
The view was echoed by Reed Brody of Human Rights Watch. 鈥淚t鈥檚 hard to get your own people to shoot your own people,鈥� he said. 鈥淚n this kind of situation, you can see why mercenaries would be an advantage because it鈥檚 easier to get foreigners to shoot at Libyans than to get Libyans to shoot at Libyans.鈥�
Some of the foreign fighters in Libya also seem to come from groups that have long-standing political and financial ties to the Colonel. Qaddafi鈥檚 sustained and deep involvement in African politics, especially the affairs of neighboring countries like Sudan, Chad, and Niger, has 鈥渇unding and training many fighting groups and rebel organizations in West Africa and other places.鈥� Qaddafi鈥檚 relationship with Chad is especially intense. These ties not only affected the trajectory of conflicts outside Libya, but also shaped the composition of Libya鈥檚 security forces:
Other rebels, who stand to suffer if Qaddafi falls, have been willing to join the :
That gives us at least three categories of foreign fighters in Libya: foreigners who are part of the formal security forces, foreigners who are fighting for Qaddafi for political reasons, and foreigners who are killing Libyans primarily for money. Let鈥檚 add two more: those were coerced into fighting, and innocent persons accused of being mercenaries.
Regarding coercion, here is the account of :
Finally, we have innocent victims. and have indicated that in some cases anti-Qaddafi Libyans have turned on African migrants that did not participate in the fighting at all.
With mercenaries and suspected mercenaries coming from so many different backgrounds, and with chaos in Libya, what will happen to Africans accused of fighting for Qaddafi? Some, currently by anti-Qaddafi forces, are 鈥渘ervously await[ing] their fate.鈥� Others will die in battle, of course, or in lynchings. Still others may escape back across the border.
What will not happen to the mercenaries, apparently, is .
Toppling the Colonel is obviously the foremost goal for the anti-Qaddafi forces. But the problem of dealing with captured and accused mercenaries is one the rebels will have to solve if they take power 鈥� and, given the US鈥檚 stance on the issue, one they will have to deal with primarily at the domestic level. The issue of mercenaries will also affect the tone of Libya鈥檚 relations with other African countries in the post-Qaddafi era, if indeed that era comes.
鈥� Alex Thurston is a PhD student studying Islam in Africa at Northwestern University and blogs at .
