海角大神

Sen. Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia, is right in the thick of the news. As chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, he鈥檚 grappling with security concerns over the popular TikTok app and its China connection, ramifications of Chinese leader Xi Jinping鈥檚 visit to Moscow this week, and other issues around Russia鈥檚 brutal war in Ukraine.

As a member of the Senate Banking Committee, Senator Warner is also knee-deep in the failure of California鈥檚 Silicon Valley Bank and the future of banking regulation. In 2018, he voted for a measure that rolled back some regulations on midsize banks, like SVB, and he has stuck by that support.聽

But the Virginia Democrat is also open to new banking reforms, he says, after an inquiry by the Federal Reserve is completed into what caused SVB to fail.聽

鈥淟et me be clear, we need to figure out what happened,鈥� Senator Warner told reporters at a breakfast hosted Monday by 海角大神. 鈥淎nd if there were things that happened in 2018 that helped create this crisis, I鈥檓 wide open to making changes.鈥�

The senator added that he was 鈥渁bsolutely supportive鈥� of President Joe Biden鈥檚 statement last Friday urging Congress to give the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. power to 鈥渃law back鈥� executive pay at failed banks, among other punitive measures. The Fed鈥檚 first round of investigation into SVB鈥檚 failure is expected by May 1.聽

At the Monitor Breakfast, Senator Warner also pledged to donate campaign money from SVB and its now-ex-CEO, Greg Becker, to charity if the Fed finds wrongdoing.聽

鈥淟isten, I have never been influenced by campaign contributions on any issue,鈥� the senator said. 鈥淪econdly, if there was malfeasance, of course I鈥檓 going to turn it back. I鈥檒l give it to charity.鈥�

Members of Congress from both parties, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, have received donations from SVB, as did the Democratic National Committee and the Biden 2020 campaign. Some recipients, including the DNC and Biden campaign, to charity.聽

Following are more excerpts from the breakfast with Senator Warner, lightly edited for clarity:聽

On Thursday, the CEO of TikTok appears before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He is expected to say that TikTok now has some 150 million users in the United States, the suggestion being that it鈥檚 so entrenched in our lives that it can鈥檛 be reined in. What鈥檚 your response to that?

I disagree. ... And there鈥檚 a twofold concern I have. One is that the data that is being collected, regardless of the assurances from the company, ... I don鈥檛 think [it鈥檚] safe.

Let鈥檚 go back to China鈥檚 laws and 2016. The Communist Party put in place, by law, that every company at the end of the day owes its first obligation to the Communist Party, not to shareholders, not to customers. So this notional idea that the data can be made safe, under CCP [Communist Party of China] law just doesn鈥檛 pass the smell test.聽

Secondly, and this is where I鈥檓 even more concerned, and that鈥檚 its ability to be a propaganda tool. That the TikTok that Chinese kids get operates under a different company, and is a site that advocates science and engineering and studying hard and being a good citizen. The stuff our kids get, not so much.

Bipartisan members of the Senate Intelligence Committee are unhappy with the Biden administration鈥檚 unwillingness to share key details on President Biden鈥檚 handling of classified documents. Where does that situation stand?聽

The administration鈥檚 position is untenable. It doesn鈥檛 pass any kind of smell test. If there was a violation made by President Trump, President Biden, or Vice President Pence about the mishandling of documents, that ought to be pursued.聽

I鈥檓 concerned not only about the documents, but what has been done, if anything, to mitigate [further mishandling].

How does the intelligence community, particularly the CIA, see Russia and China?聽

China is much more difficult to penetrate. Remember, this is in the public domain: [FBI Director] Chris Wray indicated the FBI starts 10 new counterespionage cases against China every day.聽

No. 2, I鈥檓 an age where we always viewed the Soviet Union/Russia as a potential adversary. We didn鈥檛 have that vis-脿-vis China. And matter of fact, I was part of the absolute conventional wisdom theory of the case in the early parts of the 2000s. I remember going to China as a governor and encouraging all these deals and university collaboration, cross-collaboration with the premise that the closer we bring [China] into the international order, the more they鈥檙e going to operate like the balance of the world.聽

With the rise of Xi, we were just wrong. I mean, I would sit in all of these Intel hearings, and every week hear another horror story about what was happening, from intellectual property theft to the kind of joint ventures where [there鈥檚] this giant sucking sound of technology being exploited, the investments China was making.聽

If I leave you with no other thought, it is that national security in 2023 is different than it was in 2003 and 1993. It is increasingly a technology competition. Who has the most tanks, guns, and planes is not going to be the determiner. It is going to be, who is the most successful in telecommunications, in advanced energy, in synthetic biology, in quantum computing, in artificial intelligence.