海角大神

President Obama鈥檚 comments on marijuana continue to roil US politics Tuesday. Some pundits say Mr. Obama has brought needed perspective to the legalization debate by in essence playing down pot鈥檚 dangers. But others believe he鈥檚 wrong on the science of addiction and has made it harder for parents to handle a difficult issue with their kids.

鈥淲hatever we decide to do in terms of legalization ... the president might at least refrain from giving every teen in the country a comeback to his parents (鈥�But the president says ...鈥�),鈥� writes the Washington Post鈥檚 Jennifer Rubin on her conservative-leaning .

In case you missed it, here鈥檚 the backstory: In an interview with New Yorker magazine editor David Remnick released Sunday, the president said that marijuana is not any more dangerous than alcohol or tobacco in terms of its impact on individuals.

鈥淎s has been well documented, I smoked pot as a kid, and I view it as a bad habit and a vice, not very different from the cigarettes that I smoked as a young person up through a big chunk of my adult life,鈥� Obama said.

The president told Mr. Remnick that he鈥檚 disturbed by the disparities in punishment for marijuana use. Minorities and poor people are more likely to be arrested and locked up for smoking or selling pot than are middle-class Americans, according to Obama.

But he added that he鈥檚 aware that pot legalization could lead to slippery-slope arguments about normalizing the use of other drugs. And the president said that as a parent he鈥檚 warned Sasha and Malia about the dangers of the drug.

鈥淚鈥檝e told my daughters I think it鈥檚 a bad idea, a waste of time,鈥� said Obama.

Interestingly, political reaction to these statements cuts across partisan lines to some extent.

Some Republicans do argue that the GOP, as a party, should oppose legalization. that 鈥淩epublicans need to be clear: Marijuana use doesn鈥檛 lead to anything helpful or productive. The president won鈥檛 say so, but Republican leaders should.鈥�

But others on the right argue that individual liberty would be increased and societal costs decreased if the US dialed back federal opposition to marijuana.

鈥淲e should at least be talking about reducing the penalties, danger, and illegality for a drug that society decided a long time ago it likes,鈥� writes Allahpundit on the conservative-leaning .

Meanwhile, not all liberals agree with Obama鈥檚 comments. Chris Matthews, normally a reliable administration supporter, said on his MSNBC show 鈥�Hardball鈥� Monday that Obama is wrong to say pot is no more dangerous than alcohol. Former US Rep. Patrick Kennedy, son of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy and chairman of the advocacy group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, agreed with Mr. Matthews and added that today鈥檚 pot is much more potent and dangerous than the weed Obama smoked during his teenage 鈥淐hoom Gang鈥� days.

鈥淗e鈥檚 wrong when he says it isn鈥檛 very harmful,鈥�

As to the possible reaction of voters, polls indicate that support for marijuana legalization has recently passed a threshold, with a majority in favor. Last October a found 58 percent of Americans said pot should be legal.

And Obama鈥檚 words may have political effects in the relatively short term. Other states are planning to follow Colorado and Washington State鈥檚 lead and put referenda on pot legalization on the ballot.

In Oregon, for instance, advocates are gathering signatures in a campaign that appears somewhat likely to put recreational marijuana use up to voters in 2014. The president鈥檚 position on the issue 鈥渨ill certainly have an impact on voters in the state of Oregon,鈥� state Rep. Vicki Berger (R) newspaper.