Donald Trump invited to speak at CPAC. Is that a good idea?
Donald Trump will speak at next week鈥檚 Conservative Political Action Conference. Organizers on Tuesday announced that they鈥檇 invited the mogul/reality-show host to reprise his 2011 CPAC appearance and that he鈥檇 accepted.
鈥淒onald Trump is an American patriot and success story with a massive following among small government conservatives,鈥� said American Conservative Union chairman Al Cardenas . 鈥淚 look forward to welcoming him back to the CPAC stage.鈥�
Hmm. Is this really, you know, a good idea?
We can understand why The Donald himself would want to do it. It鈥檚 true that his 2011 speech produced loads of publicity. Of course, that鈥檚 back when he was toying with the idea of running for president himself, or at least pretending to think about a run for the Oval Office. Any attention this drew to 鈥�Celebrity Apprentice鈥� or the various Trump golf projects around the world was purely incidental, we鈥檙e sure.
And as a card-carrying member of the mainstream media (non-elite division), we鈥檙e overjoyed to link 鈥淭rump鈥� and 鈥減olitics鈥� in sentences once again. He produces controversy as easily as most humans exhale carbon dioxide. Who can forget his proposal to slap a 25 percent tariff on all Chinese goods? Certainly not US retail chains, which would have seen the prices of all their Chinese-made goods go up by the same amount. And remember when he kept challenging President Obama for his long-form birth certificate? And then Mr. Obama broke into the 鈥淐elebrity Apprentice鈥� time slot to announce that the United States had killed Osama bin Laden? That鈥檚 in the dictionary now as a usage example for 鈥渒ismet.鈥�
But CPAC snubbed New Jersey鈥檚 popular GOP governor, Chris Christie, refusing to extend him a speaking invite. They also turned away sitting Virginia governor Bob McDonnell (R).
鈥淐PAC is like an all-star game for conservatives,鈥� sniffed Mr. Cardenas to The Washington Post as an explanation for the move.
Now Mr. Trump? This has driven lots of Republicans in general and conservatives in particular over the edge. Conservative pundit Michelle Malkin 鈥� who鈥檚 feuded with Trump in the past 鈥� : 鈥淲omanizing, property-rights trampling, blowhard Donald Trump. Yep, there鈥檚 a face that鈥檒l 鈥榤odernize鈥� the conservative movement!鈥�
The right-leaning Washington Examiner editorial board weighed in against the pick, : 鈥淐PAC flouts conservatism鈥檚 rich intellectual tradition by inviting such a transparent crackpot.鈥�
And conservative Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin wrote that conservatives of all stripes have 鈥渓aunched an assault on CPAC鈥� over Trump, Governor Christie, and Governor McDonnell 鈥� and what those choices say to the rest of America about where the right wing of US politics currently stands.
鈥淎n older generation, tone deaf and out of step with popular sensibilities, needs to hang it up. Had CPAC been in the hands of young, brainy conservatives, it would be the 鈥榗ool鈥� club and not a punch line,鈥� in a post titled 鈥�10 lessons from CPAC鈥檚 debacle.鈥�
Meanwhile, liberals are making fun of the Trump appearance, though the outrage on the right makes it harder for them to portray the pick as emblematic of the Republican Party. Maybe it鈥檚 a rare moment of Washington bipartisanship!
We鈥檇 like to add one thing in closing: Many of the critics here may have forgotten that when Trump went to CPAC in 2011, he was booed.
It鈥檚 true. During his speech, he noted the obvious point that Ron Paul would not win the GOP nomination and was not going to be president of the United States.
The CPAC crowd can skew libertarian, and the many Paul supporters in attendance didn鈥檛 like that. Hence the raspberries.
鈥淚 like Ron Paul. I think he is a good guy, but honestly, he just has zero chance of getting elected,鈥� Trump concluded back then.
