海角大神

Senate report: Interrogation methods 'far worse' than CIA acknowledged

Lawmakers and the CIA are wrangling over releasing details of a Senate report on the 鈥渆nhanced interrogation鈥 techniques used on terrorist suspects. Leaked portions of the report say such techniques were 鈥渂rutal and far worse鈥 than the agency acknowledged.

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. speaking on Capitol Hill in Washington. The committee鈥檚 vote to approve declassifying part of a secret report on Bush-era interrogations of terrorism suspects puts the onus on the CIA and a reluctant White House to speed the release of one of the most definitive accounts about the government鈥檚 actions after the 9/11 attacks.

鈥淓nhanced interrogation鈥 鈥 the euphemism for the partial drowning known as water-boarding, sleep deprivation for days at a time, stress positions, and other harsh techniques that many people consider to be torture 鈥 undoubtedly will be a signature phrase in histories written about the US-led invasion of Iraq and the ten years of war and occupation that followed. As will 鈥渨eapons of mass destruction,鈥 鈥渟hock and awe,鈥 and 鈥渋mprovised explosive devices鈥 (IEDs).

The US Senate and the Central Intelligence Agency have been wrangling over a 6,300-page report on the CIA鈥檚 interrogation program put together by the Senate Intelligence Committee, specifically what can and should be made public.

鈥淲e believe that public release is the best way to ensure that this program of secret detention and coercive interrogation never happens again,鈥 committee chair Sen. Dianne Feinstein and former chair Sen. Jay Rockefeller wrote in the Washington Post this week. 鈥淚t will also serve to uphold America鈥檚 practice of admitting wrongdoing and learning from its mistakes.鈥

The committee recently voted 11-3 to declassify and release a 481-page executive summary of the report, plus its findings and conclusions. The Obama administration and the CIA are considering whether this is a good idea.

Meanwhile, the McClatchy news organization has obtained at least a portion of that still-classified document, including its 20 main conclusions.

鈥淭aken together, they paint a picture of an intelligence agency that seemed intent on evading or misleading nearly all of its oversight mechanisms throughout the program, which was launched under the Bush administration after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and ran until 2006,鈥 this week. 鈥淭he investigation determined that the program produced very little intelligence of value and that the CIA misled the Bush White House, the Congress and the public about the effectiveness of the interrogation techniques鈥︹

A complete list of the committee鈥檚 findings is . They include:

鈥 The CIA鈥檚 use of enhanced interrogation techniques did not effectively assist the agency in acquiring intelligence or in gaining cooperation from detainees.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽

鈥 The CIA did not conduct a comprehensive or accurate accounting of the number of individuals it detained and held individuals who did not meet the legal standard for detention. The CIA鈥檚 claims about the number of detainees held and subjected to its enhanced interrogation techniques were inaccurate.

鈥 The CIA inaccurately characterized the effectiveness of the enhanced interrogation techniques to justify their use.聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽

鈥 The CIA鈥檚 use of enhanced interrogation techniques was brutal and far worse than the agency communicated to policymakers.聽

鈥 The conditions of confinement for CIA detainees were brutal and far worse than the agency communicated to policymakers.

鈥 CIA personnel who were responsible for serious violations, inappropriate behavior, or management failures in the program鈥檚 operations were seldom reprimanded or held accountable by the agency.

鈥 The CIA鈥檚 Detention and Interrogation Program damaged the United States鈥 global reputation, and came with heavy costs, both monetary and nonmonetary.

According to the McClatchy article, the report also states that the CIA impeded oversight by the White House, Congress, and the CIA鈥檚 own inspector general.

As portions of the Senate report leak out, critics and opponents of the CIA鈥檚 use of harsh interrogation methods are finding new ammunition in their fight for accountability.

鈥淭he White House 鈥 and not the CIA 鈥 must oversee the declassification process, and eventually must disclose the entire report,鈥 the Center for Constitutional Rights said in a statement. 鈥淭he White House also must ensure that U.S. officials who authorized or carried out the acts of torture described in the report are prosecuted and held accountable for their crimes, and that the individuals who were subjected to these acts of brutality are provided redress. Transparency is not the same as justice.鈥

Faith groups in particular have been involved.

鈥淎s people of faith, the members of the National Religious Campaign Against Torture believe that torture is always wrong,鈥 the Rev. Ron Steif, the group鈥檚 executive director, said in a statement. 鈥淎dmitting the truth about the United States鈥 past is the first step toward redemption.鈥

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
海角大神 was founded in 1908 to lift the standard of journalism and uplift humanity. We aim to 鈥渟peak the truth in love.鈥 Our goal is not to tell you what to think, but to give you the essential knowledge and understanding to come to your own intelligent conclusions. Join us in this mission by subscribing.
QR Code to Senate report: Interrogation methods 'far worse' than CIA acknowledged
Read this article in
/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2014/0412/Senate-report-Interrogation-methods-far-worse-than-CIA-acknowledged
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe