Chris Christie lambasts role of 'dark money' in campaign finance
| New York
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is 鈥渇lying high鈥� after his record-smashing fundraising helped Republicans dominate governor鈥檚 races across the country this week. The governor took on the nation鈥檚 byzantine array of campaign finance laws Thursday 鈥� including the shadowy networks of anonymous 鈥渄ark money鈥� that flowed through independent political groups this year.
Calling current campaign finance rules a 鈥渇antasy,鈥� the outspoken New Jersey governor, who is mulling a 2016 run for the White House, suggested that rules restricting direct campaign contributions to candidates themselves have created an unaccountable system run amok.
鈥淎ll they're doing is that the restrictions are just being gone around,鈥� 鈥淭hey set up secret groups that don鈥檛 have to disclose their donors, and you don鈥檛 know who鈥檚 running the ads.鈥�
And while Christie did not directly criticize the Supreme Court's controversial 2010 Citizens United decision, he weighed in once again on the disclosure loopholes that allow anonymous money to flood the nation鈥檚 airwaves with independent ads.
鈥淵ou want to have campaign finance reform? I鈥檓 all for it,鈥� he said. 鈥淟et鈥檚 get rid of all these secret groups. Have anybody be able to write any size check they want to any candidate they want at any time they want, but the candidate has to disclose the receipt of that contribution within 24 hours, on the Internet.鈥�
Liberal groups and Democrats have long criticized the 5 to 4 Citizens United ruling, which said that federal and state governments can not restrict the free political speech of individuals 鈥� including 鈥渁ssociations鈥� of individuals in corporations and unions.
Yet laws restricting direct contributions to candidates themselves still stand, the high court ruled, agreeing that such contributions could lead to corruption.
The decision spawned the rise of the 鈥渟uper PAC,鈥� political action committees that can raise unlimited amounts of cash to express political opinions freely. But these committees can still be required to disclose who鈥檚 giving them money, the court ruled, and they may not coordinate their spending on political speech with any particular candidate or campaign.
While super PACs must disclose their unrestricted donors, these donors often include independent nonprofit groups, who are not subject to disclosure rules. The anonymous and unrestricted money raised by such nonprofits 鈥� which can include civic and business leagues, social welfare organizations, and real estate boards 鈥� is often called 鈥渄ark money.鈥�
Together, outside super PACs and non-profits spent about $540 million this election cycle, , a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.
Christie, however, wants to see this cash fully disclosed 鈥� and in the hands of candidates.
鈥淚f an ad鈥檚 made that people don鈥檛 like, you can鈥檛 attribute it to the candidate,鈥� Christie said. 鈥淵ou go to the candidate, the candidate says, 鈥業 had nothing to do with that! It wasn鈥檛 my committee! It was this independent committee that I can鈥檛 have any involvement with.' I mean, it鈥檚 a fantasy.鈥�
The New Jersey governor, who campaigned vigorously for Republican candidates leading up to election day on Tuesday, also said his travels were 鈥渁 good trial run鈥� for the rigors of being on the road in a potential presidential campaign.
