海角大神

The Supreme Court said Monday that for now it鈥檒l be up to Congress, not the court, to decide whether to change the requirement that only men must register for the draft. It鈥檚 one of the few areas of federal law where men and women are still treated differently.

In a statement, three justices said Congress is weighing whether to change the Military Selective Service Act, which requires men but not women to register for the draft when they turn 18. They said that was a reason for the court to kick the matter back to lawmakers.

鈥淚t remains to be seen, of course, whether Congress will end gender-based registration under the Military Selective Act,鈥� Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement for herself, Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Brett Kavanaugh. 鈥淏ut at least for now, the Court鈥檚 longstanding deference to Congress on matters of national defense and military affairs cautions against granting review while Congress actively weighs the issue.鈥�

In recent years, bills to require women to register for the draft have been proposed in the House but not gone anywhere. Just last year, however, a congressional commission concluded that the 鈥渢ime is right鈥� to extend the obligation to register to women. The Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on the report this year, and Justice Sotomayor pointed to the report and the hearing, suggesting Congress is currently studying the issue.

The question of whether it鈥檚 unconstitutional to require men but not women to register could be viewed as one with little practical impact. The last time there was a draft was during the Vietnam War, and the military has been all-volunteer since. But women鈥檚 groups are among those arguing that allowing the male-only requirement to stand is harmful.

Ria Tabacco Mar, director of the American Civil Liberties Union鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project, who had urged the court to take up the issue, said that requiring men to register imposes a 鈥渟erious burden on men that鈥檚 not being imposed on women.鈥�

Men who do not register can lose eligibility for student loans and civil service jobs, and failing to register is also a felony punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and five years in prison. But Ms. Mar said the male-only requirement does more than that.

鈥淚t鈥檚 also sending a tremendously harmful message that women are less fit than men to serve their country in this particular way and conversely that men are less fit than women to stay home as caregivers in the event of an armed conflict,鈥� said Ms. Mar, who represents the National Coalition For Men and two individual men who challenged the law. 鈥淲e think those stereotypes demean both men and women.鈥�

Even if the draft is never used again, retaining the requirement sends a 鈥渞eally damaging message,鈥� she said. On Monday, she urged Congress in a statement to 鈥渦pdate the law either by requiring everyone to register for the draft, regardless of their gender, or by not requiring anyone to register.鈥�

A group of retired senior military officers and the National Organization for Women Foundation were among those that had urged the court to take the case.

The issue of who has to register for the draft has been to the court before. In 1981, the court voted 6-3 to uphold the men-only registration requirement. At the time, the decision was something of an outlier because the court was regularly invalidating gender-based distinctions in cases about other areas of the law. Many of those cases were brought by the founding director of the ACLU鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who became a justice in 1993.

The last time the high court considered the Military Selective Service Act, then-Justice William Rehnquist explained that the purpose of registration 鈥渨as to prepare for a draft of combat troops.鈥� He said that because women could not serve in combat, the law was not unlawful sex discrimination that violated the Constitution.

But military policy has changed. In 2013, the Defense Department lifted the ban on women serving in combat. Two years later, the department said all military positions would be open to women without exception.

The Biden administration had urged the justices not to take the case and to let Congress instead tackle the issue. Administration lawyers wrote in a brief that any 鈥渞econsideration of the constitutionality of the male-only registration requirement ... would be premature at this time鈥� because Congress is 鈥渁ctively considering鈥� the issue.

The case is National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, 20-928.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.