海角大神

Should domestic abusers own guns? No, says Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a federal law that prohibits people convicted of misdemeanor domestic abuse from owning guns.

|
Alex Brandon/AP
The Supreme Court building is seen in Washington last week as the court announced several decisions.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday to uphold聽a federal law that prohibits those convicted of domestic violence from owning guns, regardless of whether the violence was premeditated or not.聽

The case in question involved two聽Maine men who claimed they should not be barred from owning firearms after pleading guilty to hitting their partners. Both men had been charged with possessing guns while having past domestic abuse misdemeanor convictions.聽

The justices rejected arguments from the men聽that the law only covers premeditated acts of abuse, not acts of abuse committed in the heat of an argument.聽

"A person who assaults another recklessly 鈥榰se[s]鈥 force, no less than one who or intentionally," wrote Justice Elena Kagan, who authored the majority opinion. 聽

Justice Kagan was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, along with Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Samuel Alito for a 6-2 ruling.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Clarence Thomas dissented.聽

"We treat so cavalierly," said Justice Thomas in his dissent. "In construing the statute before us expansively so that causing a single minor reckless injury or offensive touching can lead someone to lose his right to bear arms forever, the court continues to relegate the Second Amendment to a second-class right."聽

Thomas's dissent reflected the views of some聽gun rights groups, who argued that聽the men shouldn't lose their constitutional right to bear arms because of misdemeanor abuse convictions.聽聽

The ruling was applauded by advocates for victims of domestic abuse. According to one study, domestic violence victims are if their abuser has access to a gun.聽

Some advocates, such as Judge Judy Harris Kluger, executive director of Sanctuary for Families,聽said that while the ruling is a good step, loopholes in current gun laws still allow convicted abusers to access firearms with relative ease.聽

"Today鈥檚 ruling is an important victory," she told the Huffington Post in a statement, "but on all gun purchasers, domestic abusers still can legally obtain guns without further scrutiny."聽

This report contains material from the Associated Press.聽

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
海角大神 was founded in 1908 to lift the standard of journalism and uplift humanity. We aim to 鈥渟peak the truth in love.鈥 Our goal is not to tell you what to think, but to give you the essential knowledge and understanding to come to your own intelligent conclusions. Join us in this mission by subscribing.
QR Code to Should domestic abusers own guns? No, says Supreme Court.
Read this article in
/USA/2016/0627/Should-domestic-abusers-own-guns-No-says-Supreme-Court
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
/subscribe