Has pristine lost its innocence?
Loading...
Has pristine lost its innocence? Or did it have it in the first place? A reader writes from Australia that this word gets 鈥渂andied about very loosely these days.鈥
Pristine seems a good example of how a word can make slight shifts in meaning over time 鈥 like the 鈥渟light right鈥 or 鈥渟light left鈥 in your route that you don鈥檛 notice until the voice of Google Maps mentions it 鈥 and end up in rather a different place from where it started.
Pristine comes from the classical Latin pristinus, meaning 鈥渇ormer, previous, ancient, old.鈥 (You know the pri element from words like prior.)
Its earliest meaning was 鈥淥f or relating to the earliest period or state; original, former; primitive, ancient,鈥 according to the Oxford English Dictionary. The聽 first usage example is from a 1534 letter from Anne Boleyn, referring to someone 鈥渞estored to his pristine fredome.鈥
Four and a half centuries later, on the other side of the ocean, The New York Review of Books used pristine in Boleyn鈥檚 sense in 1992: a reference to 鈥渁 New England Yankee [whose] upbringing ... bred into him the values of American democracy in their most pristine and aboriginal form.鈥
Early in the 20th century, though, another sense of pristine emerged: 鈥渦nspoilt by human interference, untouched; pure.鈥 The 鈥減urity鈥 in the second definition connects with the idea of 鈥渙riginal state鈥 in the first. The two are distinct, but not unrelated.
Oxford cites an Australian newspaper鈥檚 1991 use of this 鈥渘ew鈥 pristine: 鈥渄umping of tons of toxic chemicals into the region鈥檚 once pristine streams and聽 聽 聽 rivers....鈥
A third sense arose in the mid-20th century: 鈥淥f a man-made object: spotless, pure in colour; fresh, as good as new; (also) brand new, newly made, unused.鈥 Oxford cites a William Faulkner story from 1940: 鈥渢he Justice raised one hand, in its enormous pristine cuff....鈥
The usage question here is whether these two new uses are just too Johnny-come-lately for serious writers.聽
The online Oxford English Dictionary quotes the 1982 OED Supplement, which observed that these uses 鈥渁re regarded with disfavour by many educated speakers.鈥 But in that they continue to be 鈥渨ell supported,鈥 the dictionary adds, citing one eminent editor, 鈥渋t is becoming increasingly difficult to find fault鈥 with them.
Not exactly a ringing endorsement, but not a condemnation, either.
And while we鈥檙e at it, what about 鈥渂andied about鈥? It鈥檚 one of those idioms that come up in only a very few specialized contexts: 鈥淗is name has been bandied about in connection with the dean of students position that has just opened up.鈥
Here鈥檚 the scoop from the : Bandy turns out to be an Irish game, a sort of proto-hockey. To bandy something about is thus to knock it around like a hockey puck. The name of our hypothetical prospective dean might be said to be 鈥渋n play.鈥 Not very respectful for a dean, I would suggest. But there you have it.