Jordan Peele returns to horror with 'Us'
Writer-director Jordan Peele鈥檚 debut feature 鈥淕et Out鈥� was one of the most inventive horror movies in years, and so the expectations for his sophomore effort, 鈥淯s,鈥� have been running sky-high. It too is a horror film with a light overlay of gallows humor, but it鈥檚 a more ambitious work than 鈥淕et Out.鈥� Despite some extraordinary sequences, it鈥檚 also a lesser work.
The film opens in 1986 in an amusement park in the oceanside city of Santa Cruz, California. A young girl, Adelaide Wilson (Madeline Curry), wanders off from her parents and enters a seemingly deserted hall of mirrors where she encounters, to traumatizing effect, not only her own reflection but a doppelganger of herself.
Cut to the present day, and Adelaide (Lupita Nyong鈥檕) is living what appears to be a comfortably middle-class suburban life with her affable husband, Gabe (Winston Duke), and聽 two spunky children, Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and Jason (Evan Alex). When Gabe proposes a summer vacation stayover in Santa Cruz, she balks at the bad memories but reluctantly goes along. Soon enough, bad stuff happens, leading to the film鈥檚 first true explosion of horror: One night, outside the Wilsons鈥� summer home, a family of red robe-wearing Wilson doppelgangers, clutching razor-sharp scissors, are silently massed in the driveway ready to attack.
As we soon see, the four actors are playing dual roles, themselves and their malevolent doubles. The home invasion is brutal, bloody, and unrelenting. Adelaide鈥檚 double, who speaks in hoarse, spasmodic, guttural tones, is especially menacing. The murderousness continues as the Wilsons, seeking refuge in the nearby home of vacationing friends, played by Tim Heidecker and Elisabeth Moss, are aghast to discover that they also have been invaded by doppelgangers.
This is one of the few horror movies to feature an African-American family, and, especially given the racial-satirical slant of 鈥淕et Out,鈥� we might expect the same slant here. However, Peele is going after bigger allegorical game. But what exactly is the allegory that Peele is pushing? In the 1986 prologue, he makes reference to the Hands Across America benefit event that was intended to raise millions for those who are hungry and homeless. The death-dealing doppelgangers in 鈥淯s,鈥� who are soon proliferating everywhere, likewise hold hands. There are several references to a Bible passage in Jeremiah 11:11 with words 鈥淚 will bring on them a disaster they cannot escape.鈥� White rabbits turn up.
Instead of specifically targeting racial animosities, Peele seems to be going after the doubleness of a society in which everyone has their dark side they refuse to acknowledge. Speaking recently to an audience at the South By Southwest film festival, as reported in the Los Angeles Times, he said as much: 鈥淥n the broader strokes of things, this movie is about this country. And when I decided to write this movie, I was stricken with the fact that we are in a time when we fear the other, whether it is the mysterious invader that we think is going to come and kill us, take our jobs, or the faction that we don鈥檛 live near that voted a different way than us. We鈥檙e all about pointing the finger. And I wanted to suggest that maybe the monster we really need to look at has our face.鈥�
The problem is, the movie is so chockablock with horror tropes and fright-night symbolism that it often comes across as nothing more than a smorgasbord of scare effects. There鈥檚 a deeper problem: Peele may think he is slamming all factions for not facing the beast within, but the way he goes after the Wilsons here is especially punitive. Their middle-classness is used against them. He sets a squadron of monsters on them for, it would appear, nothing more flagrant than indulging in materialism and social media. Are we supposed to think that the Wilsons鈥� privilege is won at the expense of the poor and the forgotten? As an allegory, not to mention as a social construct, how does the situation in 鈥淯s鈥� 鈥� as in 鈥淯nited States,鈥� get it? 鈥� reflect this country? Ambition in the horror genre can be a good thing, but the overreach in this movie detracts from both the horror and the ambition.
Having said that, Peele shows a marked advance in filmmaking skills here and, in her dual role, Nyong鈥檕 is ferociously good. Coming as it does after Toni Collette in 鈥淗ereditary鈥� and Emily Blunt in 鈥淎 Quiet Place,鈥� her performance would appear to officially herald a golden age for fullscale performances in a long-derided genre.
Talented as he is, I hope that Peele, who also is behind TV鈥檚 upcoming 鈥淭wilight Zone鈥� reboot, doesn鈥檛 seek to position himself as the new M. Night Shyamalan, complete with gotcha effects and trapdoor finales. His satiric-horrific take on society, which sporadically breaks through 鈥淯s,鈥� is a rare gift. Rarer, perhaps, than he himself realizes. Grade: B (Rated聽R for violence/terror and language.)
