'The Amazing Spider-Man': not the first comic book to get the reboot
Loading...
As 鈥The Amazing Spider-Man鈥 swings into theaters, naysayers are pointing to the date of the last 鈥淪pider-Man鈥 film 鈥 2007, to be exact.
The new film, starring Andrew Garfield as the webslinger and a cast of kind-of-new main characters, is being billed as a reboot of the trilogy that came to theaters starting in 2002 with 鈥淪pider-Man,鈥 directed by Sam Raimi and starring Tobey Maguire. The first one was received positively by critics and audiences, and 鈥Spider-Man 2鈥 was widely acknowledged to be even better than its predecessor, with actor Alfred Molina taking on the role of the villainous Dr. Octopus (that鈥檚 Doc Ock to you). Then 鈥Spider-Man 3鈥 came, which both critics and audiences agreed was too stuffed with villains and plotlines and is perhaps best remembered for its sequence in which an evil Maguire dances in a jazz club.
A fourth movie by the team who produced the last three was planned, with a release date announced, but ultimately Raimi told the studio he couldn鈥檛 produce a film in that timeframe and still meet his personal standards.
鈥淲hile we were looking forward to doing a fourth one together, the studio and Marvel have a unique opportunity to take the franchise in a new direction, and I know they will do a terrific job,鈥 the director at the time when they decided to put the kibosh on a fourth film and go with a reboot.
So now we have 鈥淭he Amazing Spider-Man,鈥 a new version five years later that centers on hero Peter Parker鈥檚 time in high school, which was briefly addressed in the first installment of the Raimi series. However, leading lady Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) and best friend Harry Osborn (James Franco), as well as Harry鈥檚 villainous father Norman, are gone (for now, one presumes). Director Marc Webb鈥檚 film, 鈥淭he Amazing Spider-Man,鈥 brings girlfriend Gwen Stacy back to the forefront after the character had made her first appearance in 鈥淪pider-Man 3,鈥 played by actress Bryce Dallas Howard, and introduces Dr. Curt Connors, who has never appeared in a 鈥淪pider-Man鈥 film, as its villain. Connors later becomes the sinister Lizard.
鈥Spider-Man鈥 isn鈥檛 the first comic book character to get an all-new film version only a few years after the first. After 鈥Brokeback Mountain鈥 director Ang Lee鈥檚 2003 film adaptation of the Hulk, titled 鈥淗ulk鈥 and starring Eric Bana as the scientist, received disappointing reviews and box office returns, director Louis Leterrier tried again in 2008 with 鈥The Incredible Hulk,鈥 this time starring Edward Norton as Bruce Banner/The Hulk. The 2003 version has a 62% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, while the 2008 film has a slightly higher rating with 67%; 鈥淗ulk鈥 earned a worldwide box office gross of $245 million, while 鈥淭he Incredible Hulk鈥 earned $263 million worldwide.
Reviews for 鈥淭he Amazing Spider-Man鈥 are pretty good to great so far 鈥 reviewers' main complaints have been that a remake isn't all that necessary. Monitor critic Peter Rainer wrote that 鈥渢here isn鈥檛 any particular reason, besides the obvious commercial one, why we needed to re-up this franchise. Still, it could have been worse.鈥
But many critics have praised Garfield鈥檚 performance, including Rainer. critic Kenneth Turan reports that 鈥淕arfield also brings an interesting whiff of -type teen anguish to the role of a young man whose parents up and disappeared when he was small.鈥
Lisa Schwarzbaum of agrees. 鈥淕arfield fills both his slackerish Peter Parker identity as well as his Spider-Man rubberwear with star-quality confidence鈥 mixing self-effacing sweetness with believable teen boy arrogance, then adding a wee drop of snark,鈥 she writes.
However "Amazing" does at the box office, it's safe to say Hollywood won't fall out of love with the remake anytime soon.