#TwitterBlackout: Protests brew as complaints over censorship come to a boil
Twitter yesterday announced that it would invoke the right to censor messages on a country-by-country basis. In a blog post, Twitter reps said the move was necessary to abide by the laws of聽"countries that have different ideas about the contours of freedom of expression." In the past, Twitter was forced to strike clean objectionable tweets on a "global" scale 鈥� the offending message, in other words, would disappear across the board.聽
With the new technology, Twitter can preserve content in some countries, while preventing it from being seen in others.聽"We have also built in a way to communicate transparently to users when content is withheld, and why," Twitter reps . "We haven鈥檛 yet used this ability, but if and when we are required to withhold a Tweet in a specific country, we will attempt to let the user know, and we will clearly mark when the content has been withheld."
Perhaps inevitably, the announcement has been met with tremendous push-back from certain corners of the Web, where thousands of Twitter users have banded together to rage against the new policy. For most of the day, #TwitterBlackout has dipped on and off the trending topics list on Twitter 鈥� a reference to a grassroots protest planned for Saturday, January 28.聽
Up in arms over Twitter censorship? Join the blackout, and stay away from Twitter for 24 hours.聽
Of course, as some users have noted, 24 hours may not be enough to get the message across. "Why boycott it just for 1 day If you really think it's wrong?" one hardliner asked, in a tweet by the Guardian. "[T]alk about a week or a month & I shall take you seriously." Another added, coyly: "Surprised there's not more outrage about聽#twittercensorship聽鈥� although maybe there is and the tweets are being blocked."
So are the new Twitter policies actually that objectionable? Well, yes and no, Jillian C. York in an admirably clearheaded assessment over at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
"Let鈥檚 be clear:聽This聽is聽censorship," York writes. "There鈥檚 no way around that. But alas,聽Twitter is not above the law. Just about every company hosting user-generated content has, at one point or another, gotten an order or government request to take down content. Google lays out its orders in its聽. Other companies are less forthright. In any case, Twitter has two options in the event of a request: Fail to comply, and risk being blocked by the government in question, or comply (read: censor).聽 And if they have 'boots on the ground,' so to speak, in the country in question? No choice."聽
For more tech news, follow us on聽. And don鈥檛 forget to sign up for the weekly聽.
