No, Twitter isn't removing its 140-character limit
Loading...
As of right now, the rumors that Twitter is dropping its trademark 140-character limit are just that 鈥 rumors.
Word of the potential change was first reported on Tuesday by , which cited several people familiar with the company鈥檚 plans. They say the network is working to allow 鈥渢weets that are longer than the company鈥檚 140-character limit.鈥
This does not mean, that the cap on tweets is going to be removed.
Instead, the change will allow users to wrote re/code. 鈥淚t鈥檚 unclear what the product will look like.鈥
Currently, users can already bypass the limit in other ways, such as adding pictures or embedding other tweets.
Some say this is just a natural step toward publishing 鈥渄istributed content,鈥 something Facebook already does by allowing news organizations to host articles directly on its website.
鈥淵our Twitter feed will continue to look much the same as it does today,鈥 Will Oremus. 鈥淭he difference will be that, for certain tweets, you鈥檒l have the option to click or tap a button (鈥楨xpand,鈥 perhaps) to view the full article or blog post听without leaving your Twitter feed.鈥
Twitter has not publicly commented on the matter.
The 140-character limit, which first imposed on SMS text messages, has long divided users into two camps: 鈥渢oo short,鈥 or 鈥渏ust right.鈥
鈥淚t鈥檚 like Twitter has chosen 140 characters as the perfect length in which you can wind someone up and be misunderstood without context,鈥 one user.
鈥淲ithout the 140 character limit, Twitter becomes a 2nd Facebook. And guess what I *don't* need?鈥 another.听
Last month, Twitter听, saying it wanted to let users 鈥渆xpress themselves鈥 more adequately. And as the company works out how to expand its user base, the subject has also听, according to re/code.
鈥淔or better or worse, pressure from stockholders who made the mistake of valuing the company as 'the next Facebook' is finally forcing it to make some bolder changes,鈥 Mr. Oremus. 鈥淒ecry them if you will, but don鈥檛 make them out to be more drastic than they are.鈥