Heed the warning signs? 鈥楪odfather鈥 of AI cautions misuse of AI.
Loading...
| Washington
Sounding alarms about artificial intelligence has become a popular pastime in the ChatGPT era, taken up by high-profile figures as varied as industrialist Elon Musk, leftist intellectual Noam Chomsky, and the retired statesman Henry Kissinger.
But it鈥檚 the concerns of insiders in the AI research community that are attracting particular attention. A pioneering researcher and the 鈥淕odfather of AI鈥 Geoffrey Hinton quit his role at Google so he could more freely speak about the dangers of the technology he helped create.
Over his decadeslong career, Mr. Hinton鈥檚 pioneering work on deep learning and neural networks helped lay the foundation for much of the AI technology we see today.
There has been a spasm of AI introductions in recent months. The San Francisco-based startup OpenAI, the Microsoft-backed company behind ChatGPT, rolled out its latest artificial intelligence model, GPT-4, in March. Other tech giants have invested in competing tools 鈥 including Google鈥檚 鈥淏ard.鈥
Some of the dangers of AI chatbots are 鈥渜uite scary,鈥 Mr. Hinton told the BBC. 鈥淩ight now, they鈥檙e not more intelligent than us, as far as I can tell. But I think they soon may be.鈥
In an interview with MIT Technology Review, Mr. Hinton also pointed to 鈥渂ad actors鈥 that may use AI in ways that could have detrimental impacts on society 鈥 such as manipulating elections or instigating violence.
Mr. Hinton, says he retired from Google so that he could speak openly about the potential risks as someone who no longer works for the tech giant.
鈥淚 want to talk about AI safety issues without having to worry about how it interacts with Google鈥檚 business,鈥 he told MIT Technology Review. 鈥淎s long as I鈥檓 paid by Google, I can鈥檛 do that.鈥
Since announcing his departure, Mr. Hinton has maintained that Google has 鈥渁cted very responsibly鈥 regarding AI. He told MIT Technology Review that there are also 鈥渁 lot of good things about Google鈥 that he would want to talk about 鈥 but those comments would be 鈥渕uch more credible if I鈥檓 not at Google anymore.鈥
Google confirmed that Mr. Hinton had retired from his role after 10 years overseeing the Google Research team in Toronto.
Mr. Hinton declined further comment Tuesday but said he would talk more about it at a conference Wednesday.
At the heart of the debate on the state of AI is whether the primary dangers are in the future or present. On one side are hypothetical scenarios of existential risk caused by computers that supersede human intelligence. On the other are concerns about automated technology that鈥檚 already getting widely deployed by businesses and governments and can cause real-world harm.
鈥淔or good or for not, what the chatbot moment has done is made AI a national conversation and an international conversation that doesn鈥檛 only include AI experts and developers,鈥 said Alondra Nelson, who, until February, led the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and its push to craft guidelines around the responsible use of AI tools.
鈥淎I is no longer abstract, and we have this kind of opening, I think, to have a new conversation about what we want a democratic future and a nonexploitative future with technology to look like,鈥 Ms. Nelson said in an interview last month.
A number of AI researchers have long expressed concerns about racial, gender, and other forms of bias in AI systems, including text-based large language models that are trained on huge troves of human writing and can amplify discrimination that exists in society.
鈥淲e need to take a step back and really think about whose needs are being put front and center in the discussion about risks,鈥 said Sarah Myers West, managing director of the nonprofit AI Now Institute. 鈥淭he harms that are being enacted by AI systems today are really not evenly distributed. It鈥檚 very much exacerbating existing patterns of inequality.鈥
Mr. Hinton was one of three AI pioneers who in 2019 won the Turing Award, an honor that has become known as the tech industry鈥檚 version of the Nobel Prize. The other two winners, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun, have also expressed concerns about the future of AI.
Mr. Bengio, a professor at the University of Montreal, signed a petition in late March calling for tech companies to agree to a six-month pause on developing powerful AI systems, while Mr. LeCun, a top AI scientist at Facebook parent Meta, has taken a more optimistic approach.
This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP technology reporter Matt O鈥橞rien reported from Cambridge, Massachusetts.