海角大神

The European Space Agency鈥檚 Sentinel 2B satellite from French Guyana Monday night. Set to circle the Earth in a polar orbit at the exact opposite point from its twin, Sentinel 2A, its visual and infrared camera will bolster the , a Europe-backed network of Earth-observation satellites.

It鈥檚 scheduled to have company. The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)聽, another polar-orbiting observation satellite, later this year, on the heels of the successful GOES-R weather satellite launch in November. 聽

But clouds could lie ahead for these and other missions. Last Friday, the Washington Post obtained a White House Budget memo that proposed , about 22 percent. Carol Anne Clayson, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, says that moves like these from the Trump administration have scientists on both sides of the Atlantic worried.

鈥淭he little bit that I have spoken with my colleagues from outside of the United States, concern about what might be happening has certainly been ongoing,鈥� she tells 海角大神 in a phone interview. In addition to NOAA, Dr. Clayson says that the prospect of cuts to NASA鈥檚 Earth Sciences division 鈥� which 鈥� 鈥渋s worrisome to all of us.鈥�

Cuts to US satellite funding could make waves across the Atlantic. In recent decades, US and European scientists have planned on a future of joint Earth observations. They say satellites like JPSS and Sentinel have already improved our day-to-day lives by making weather forecasts more accurate, and that even non-scientists have a stake in preserving that progress.

鈥淲hile NOAA's Satellite and Information Service (NESDIS) operates many satellites, no one country alone can afford to effectively monitor the entire Earth,鈥� NOAA spokesperson John Leslie tells the Monitor in an email. For this and other reasons, NOAA and its European counterpart EUMETSAT, the European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites, that allow US and European scientists to use data from each other鈥檚 polar-orbiting satellites, a protocol known as the .

This allows American scientists . Steve Ackerman, associate vice chancellor for research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison,聽says that data from US and European satellites makes a difference for him and his colleagues at UW's

Having information from both Sentinel and JPSS, he explains in an email, helps "our scientists...explore issues about water quality, atmospheric motions, atmospheric turbulence, changing cloud cover and monitoring air quality."

Meanwhile, Woods Hole's Dr. Clayson says that European satellites have been "particularly useful" in her research involving sea surface temperatures.

And the next time you check the weather on your phone, you鈥檙e also drawing on European know-how.

Philip Ardanuy, chief science officer at Innovim and a fellow of the American Meteorological Society, explains that US weather satellites pass over the Northern Hemisphere , crossing the equator after 12pm local time, while European satellites pass over in the morning.

"It's one of these win-win situations," he tells the Monitor over the phone. "The European satellite data improves our model forecasts, coming in their morning orbit. Our afternoon orbit improves our forecasts, but improves theirs as well. Everybody wins."

Having worked in meteorology since 1980, Dr. Ardanuy has seen firsthand the difference that satellite forecasting has made. "You don't really see jokes about weather and weathermen in the comics anymore, because there's been a dramatic improvement in weather prediction over the last couple [of] decades," he says.

In addition, . According to NOAA's John Leslie, a 2012 European study found that 鈥淣OAA forecasts of Hurricane Sandy鈥檚 track could have been hundreds of miles off鈥� 鈥� showing the hurricane out at sea, rather than making landfall 鈥� 鈥渨ithout information from polar-orbiting satellites.鈥�

If the federal government cuts funding for satellites like these, Ardanuy doesn鈥檛 expect Europe to pick up the slack. 鈥淭he Europeans aren't going to fly in an afternoon orbit,鈥� he predicts. 鈥淚t's not in their budget.鈥�

It鈥檚 not yet clear where the administration鈥檚 proposed budget cuts, if realized, would fall 鈥� on the satellites themselves, on NOAA鈥檚 data-processing centers, or elsewhere. But Dr. Ardanuy sees a bleak end result: 鈥淥ur weather prediction skill will drop.... Not just ours, but the Europeans' as well, because they depend on our data for their forecasting. Are we prepared for that?鈥�

But the budget is still far from fixed.聽As the Monitor reported last Friday, NOAA鈥檚 JPSS-1 satellite involves universities and research centers across the country, giving even senators and representatives from deep-red states reason to preserve the program.

And this isn鈥檛 the first time that US politics has thrown international research projects up in the air. Unlike Europe鈥檚 multi-country agencies, which proceed slowly but predictably, 鈥渨e have different administrations that come in and out," says Clayson. "Budgets fluctuate wildly.鈥�

According to science historian John Krige, one of those huge budget shifts came in 1994, when newly appointed NASA administrator Daniel Goldin threatened to withdraw from .

鈥淚 think if scientists can provide a good justification for projects, and if those projects have an international component, it can help,鈥� says Professor Krige, who teaches at Georgia Tech鈥檚 School of History and Sociology, in a phone interview with the Monitor.

鈥淏ut it often also requires, if it's an international project, a diplomatic d茅marche of some kind,鈥� he adds.

In the case of Cassini, ESA's director general warned that NASA's withdrawal could put future collaboration in jeopardy. Dr. Goldin softened his stance, and Cassini is now wrapping up a successful 20-year mission.

A specific strategy to protect NOAA鈥檚 satellite budget 鈥� and the international Earth-observation venture it supports 鈥� will likely have to wait until April, for fiscal year 2018.

If the deep cuts to Earth-observing satellites remain, expect to hear plenty about how these satellites have improved our lives.

鈥淚 think it's an irony that Americans for the most part benefit from the weather forecasts and the data that comes from the weather satellites every day,鈥� Ardanuy says. 鈥淚t's so behind-the-scenes that we take it for granted.鈥�

鈥淵es, it's expensive. But it's an investment in the safety and health of every American.鈥�