Scandinavia's U-turn on book reading
Amid a spate of cellphone and social media bans for young people around the world, there鈥檚 a parallel, quieter shift taking place in education. It is away from the ubiquity of digital technology and back to the analog tools of paper, pen, and pencils.
And, in an interesting twist, this change is being led by the Scandinavian nations that pioneered the shift to ed tech learning more than a decade ago. Today, they are grappling with restoring 鈥� or, rather, redefining 鈥� what contributes to meaningful and enduring education.
In 2009, Sweden 鈥� home to tech giants Spotify and Klarna, among others 鈥� swapped out printed school textbooks for computers and tablets. In 2023, it announced a 鈧�104 million ($122 million) plan to bring back book-based learning, especially in the early grades. Finland began a similar reversal in 2024. And so has Norway which, starting in 2016, issued an iPad to every 5-year-old starting school. Now, its government, teachers, and librarians are going all out to boost reading 鈥� through library-based, youth-friendly activities and community reading sessions.
Behind these shifts is public concern over declining literacy and reading comprehension. But the change also points to a broader embrace of screen- and tech-free learning as a means to support less distraction, active engagement, and deeper learning among young people.
鈥淧rogress sometimes means knowing when you鈥檝e taken a wrong turn, so you can double back and undo the mistake,鈥� observed a Swedish writer on After Babel, a Substack newsletter launched by New York University professor Jonathan Haidt. Dr. Haidt鈥檚 extensive research on the effects of online technology and social media on children and teens has spawned growing discussions about how best to balance the use of tech in the service of education.
Ed tech, according to Australian education specialist Jared Cooney Horvath, has grown 鈥渇rom a niche supplement into a $400 billion juggernaut woven into nearly every corner of schooling.鈥� But scale doesn鈥檛 necessarily equal impact. Screen reading, by its very nature, Dr. Horvath wrote in The Dispatch last December, favors 鈥渟hallow skimming 鈥� glancing, scrolling, and extracting instead of truly learning.鈥� Other researchers point out that screen-based tools substitute passive engagement and novelty for the more challenging and time-consuming consideration of new concepts.
For one longtime high school humanities teacher, the increasing intertwining of technology and AI in learning 鈥渉as done education a favor it didn鈥檛 ask for鈥� 鈥� by spurring a needed and timely reconsideration.
For too long, education has primarily been viewed as a means 鈥渢o succeed, to be useful, to secure a future,鈥� observed Aran Levasseur in the online magazine of the University of California, Berkeley-based Greater Good Science Center this week. The present moment, he indicated, offers an opportunity to 鈥渞eimagine [education] as the cultivation of judgment, purpose, and the capacity to think and choose well in a world where productivity is no longer the defining measure of human value.鈥�
