鈥淲e, the undersigned Princeton women of 鈥72, have been deeply shocked by the leaked Supreme Court draft authored by our classmate Justice Samuel Alito.鈥
So begins聽聽in The Daily Princetonian, the university鈥檚 student newspaper. It represents but one of myriad reactions to the draft decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade, the nearly 50-year-old precedent establishing the nationwide right to abortion.
But for these Princetonians, among the first women to graduate from the Ivy League school, the draft opinion felt extra personal: Many knew Mr. Alito back in the day 鈥 some from the Stevenson Hall 鈥渆ating club,鈥 and at least one as a good friend, the kind who would engage him in deep philosophical debate.
Susan Squier, the letter鈥檚 organizer, who knew Mr. Alito from their eating club, recalls him as 鈥渆arnest.鈥 At least, she allows, 鈥渉e chose to be in Stevenson, which was nonselective, and not one of the elitist clubs.鈥
Now, Ms. Squier, a professor emeritus of English and women鈥檚, gender, and sexuality studies at Pennsylvania State University, can鈥檛 conceal her anger over the societal earthquake that appears imminent.
鈥淲e ask our classmates, and the community of Princeton, to protest the logic that ties us to a constitutional originalism which resists any movement toward justice but, rather, moves us backwards,鈥 the letter states.
Of the some 47 women in the class of 鈥72 who are still alive, more than half signed the letter. Among the signers is聽聽the first Black woman to graduate from Princeton.
鈥淲ouldn鈥檛 it be lovely if [the letter] got picked up and went viral, and there was a sense of groundswell among classmates of Sam Alito,鈥 Ms. Squier says, noting their 50th reunion is May 21. 鈥淎t least this got the women in my class pretty galvanized and reconnected through our feminism.鈥