Today Japan announced that it would resume commercial whaling in 2019, breaking with a global ban in effect since 1986. The move brings international condemnation, so it is logical to ask: Why is Japan doing it?
That question is curious in light of a 2006 poll that shows the Japanese people don鈥檛 really like whale meat. Some 95 percent very rarely or never eat it. The move becomes even more curious when considering that Japan props up its whaling industry economically.
So why do it? An agronomy professor 鈥淭he strong condemnation of whaling by the foreigners is taken as harassing the traditional values.鈥
Interestingly, that same argument appears to hold sway in Iceland, one of only two countries to permit whaling now. (The other is Norway.) 鈥淚t鈥檚 a nationalistic thing,鈥 a documentary filmmaker . 鈥淭hey consider whales their resources, and they don鈥檛 want people telling them what to do with their resources.鈥
These countries see whaling as a part of a cultural tradition. The rest of the world has concluded that it is barbaric and humanity has advanced beyond it. 鈥淲haling is an outdated and unnecessary practice,鈥 said New Zealand鈥檚 foreign minister. In short, the debate has become something more than the logic of economic or environmental arguments. It has become a statement of principle.
Now on to our five articles for the day, including a mounting pushback against authoritarianism in one corner of Africa, a different kind of religion story from the Middle East, and a question: What would Norman Rockwell paint today?