Readers write: Avoiding bias, and D.C. statehood
The need for collaboration
The April 19 issue provided a perfect poster child of the Monitor! Complex issues of immigration, bullying, racial conflict, and challenges of climate change were woven together like thoughtful threads leading to the cover story, 鈥�Can American democracy be fixed?鈥澛�
These matters do not exist in isolation and require our best collaborative thinking for progress. Politicians who want to protect turf instead of ideas are enabling and extending inequalities in representation. Five states have trouble-free, total mail-in voting, with high percentages of participation. Why isn鈥檛 that model the one to pursue? Surely engaged citizenry is the way to preserve a healthy democracy.
Ann Hymes
Laguna Woods, California
Inconsistent qualification
The cover story 鈥淐an American democracy be fixed?鈥� provides a valuable analysis of the challenges facing our democracy to-day, including some helpful historical con-text. I鈥檓 happy to see the Monitor tackling this issue with candor. In terms of avoiding bias, though, I think it falls a bit short.
Wouldn鈥檛 it be fairer to refer to the president鈥檚 claims of election fraud as unfounded, rather than as lies? And why does the author refer to cancel culture as 鈥減erceived鈥� when there鈥檚 overwhelming evidence of it? It鈥檚 noteworthy that the Monitor doesn鈥檛 apply this qualifier to terms like institutional racism, though it is a controversial topic.
Jennifer Quinn
Gate City, Virginia
Why D.C. seeks statehood
Thanks for your April 19 cover story, 鈥淐an American democracy be fixed?鈥� I must correct a misconception about statehood for the District of Columbia. Citizens of the district demand equal voting rights because it is only fair. Other methods for representation have been considered, but would not address such issues as self-determination of our own budget and laws, which states do have.
Yes, while statehood would likely add two Democratic senators and a Democratic representative, we have worked on it for decades, even when it would not have tipped the balance in Congress. Maybe recognition would attract more people with varied political views.
Christine Matthews
Washington
