Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The 海角大神 Science Church, and we鈥檝e always been transparent about that.
The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we鈥檝e aimed 鈥渢o injure no man, but to bless all mankind,鈥 as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.
Here, you鈥檒l find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences 鈥 a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
President Obama鈥檚 address to the nation on Syria last night was an exercise in nuance (if you approve of his speech), mixed messaging (if you are neutral), or mixed-up messaging (if you are critical). Mr. Obama acknowledged the reluctance of a war-weary public, but made an impassioned case for targeted strikes against Syria and laid out evidence of the Assad regime鈥檚 culpability in the recent chemical weapons attack.
But Obama also praised recent diplomatic developments: Bashar al-Assad鈥檚 offer to hand over his chemical weapons to the international community, with backing from Russia. And so, Obama explained, he has asked the Senate to delay its vote on the authorization of military strikes in Syria while this diplomatic option is being pursued.
Here are three key takeaways from his address.
1.
It won't shift public opinion
Evan Vucci/AP
President Obama addresses the nation in a live televised speech from the East Room of the White House, Sept. 10. Mr. Obama blended the threat of military action with the hope of a diplomatic solution as he works to strip Syria of its chemical weapons.
It is unlikely that Obama鈥檚 speech itself will cause a seismic shift in public opinion. Speeches seldom do. People react more to real-world events than to what politicians say about those events.
John J. Pitney Jr. is the Roy P. Crocker Professor of American Politics and coauthor of 鈥淎fter Hope and Change: the 2012 Elections and American Politics.鈥
1 of 3
You've read of free articles.
Subscribe to continue.
Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.