海角大神

"Atlas Shrugged" has finally reached the big screen and, especially among tea partiers, Ayn Rand is being hailed a prophet. How could she have anticipated, more than 50 years ago, a United States spinning out of financial control, plagued by soaring spending and crippling regulations? How could she have painted villains who seem ripped from today鈥檚 headlines?

罢丑别谤别鈥檚 Wesley Mouch, who in the face of failed government programs screams like Rep. Barney Frank (D) of Massachusetts for wider powers. 罢丑别谤别鈥檚 Eugene Lawson, 鈥渢he banker with a heart,鈥� who like former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is ever ready with a bailout. 罢丑别谤别鈥檚 Mr. Thompson, who like President Obama seeks to rally the country behind pious platitudes. 罢丑别谤别鈥檚 Orren Boyle, who like President Bush says that we must abandon free-market principles to save the free market.

Time to 'go Galt'?

And in the face of this onslaught, what can you do? Should you, like Rand鈥檚 heroes, 鈥済o Galt,鈥� stop working, retreat to a secluded valley, and try to rebuild only when the country has collapsed?

Rand was asked these very questions in her own lifetime. Her answers might surprise you. In the 1970s, America was in a deep financial crisis (a new word, stagflation, had to be coined), urban violence was rampant, and power-seeking politicians like President Nixon instituted wage and price controls that led to, among other things, gas stations with no gas. How, people wondered, could Rand have foreseen all this? Was she a prophet? No, she answered. She had simply identified the basic cause of why the country was veering from crisis to new crisis.

Was the solution to 鈥済o Galt鈥� and quit society? No, Rand again answered. The solution was simultaneously much easier and much harder. 鈥淪o long as we have not yet reached the state of censorship of ideas,鈥� she once said, 鈥渙ne does not have to leave a society in the way the characters did in Atlas Shrugged.... But you know what one does have to do? One has to break relationships with the culture.... [D]iscard all the ideas 鈥� the entire cultural philosophy which is dominant today.鈥�

Now, if you鈥檝e only seen the movie, the fact that "Atlas Shrugged" is not a political novel might surprise you. But the book鈥檚 point is that our plight is caused not by corrupt politicians (who are only a symptom) or some alleged flaw in human nature. It鈥檚 caused by the philosophic ideas and moral ideals most of us embrace.

鈥淵ou have cried that man鈥檚 sins are destroying the world and you have cursed human nature for its unwillingness to practice the virtues you demanded,鈥� novel hero John Galt declares to a country in crisis. 鈥淪ince virtue, to you, consists of sacrifice, you have demanded more sacrifices at every successive disaster.鈥�

He elaborates: 鈥淵ou have sacrificed justice to mercy.鈥� (For example, calls to make homeownership 鈥渁ccessible鈥� to those who could not afford it and then bailouts and foreclosure freezes to spare them when they couldn鈥檛 pay.)

鈥淵ou have sacrificed reason to faith.鈥� (For example, attempts to prevent stem cell research on Biblical grounds or blind faith that Mr. Obama鈥檚 deliberately empty rhetoric about hope and change will magically produce prosperity.)

鈥淵ou have sacrificed wealth to need.鈥� (For example, Bush鈥檚 prescription drug benefit and Obamacare, both enacted because people needed 鈥渇ree鈥� health care.)

鈥淵ou have sacrificed self-esteem to self-denial.鈥� (For example, attacks on Bill Gates for making a fortune; applause when he gives that fortune away.)

鈥淵ou have sacrificed happiness to duty.鈥� (For example, every president鈥檚 Kennedyesque exhortations to 鈥淎sk not what your country can do for you 鈥� ask what you can do for your country.鈥�)

The result? 鈥淲hy ... do you shrink in horror from the sight of the world around you? That world is not the product of your sins, it is the product and the image of your virtues. It is your moral ideal brought into reality....鈥�

Must question our ideals

This is what "Atlas Shrugged" is asking us to question: our ideals. Rethink our convictions and philosophy of life from the ground up. Without doing so, it argues, we won鈥檛 escape further crises.

Strike, the book urges us, but intellectually, since to strike means to reject the fundamental terms of your opponents and assert your own.

This kind of thinking is difficult, Rand held, but necessary to enter the Atlantis depicted toward the end of "Atlas Shrugged" 鈥� 鈥渁t least psychologically,鈥� she wrote, 鈥渨hich is a precondition of the possibility ever to enter it existentially.鈥�

Onkar Ghate is a senior fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif.